IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i13p3300-d1429458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Comparison of Different Rotor Structures of Low-Speed Permanent Magnet Motor

Author

Listed:
  • Guanghui Du

    (School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Hui Li

    (School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Ruojin Jiang

    (School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Wanning Li

    (School of Electrical and Control Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shengli Hou

    (Naval Research Institute, Beijing 100161, China)

Abstract

At present, most of the existing research on low-speed permanent magnet motors (LSPMMs) focuses on the surface-mounted type. There are few other rotor structures, and there is no comprehensive comparison of several widely used rotor structures. A comprehensive comparison of three different rotor structures for low-speed mining motors is carried out, including electromagnetic and loss characteristics, permanent magnet consumption, temperature distribution, etc. Firstly, three rotor structures of a 500 kW, 60 rpm low-speed motor are introduced, and the initial design parameters are determined. Secondly, the influence of each rotor design parameter on the electromagnetic characteristics is analyzed. Next, the electromagnetic optimization of the three rotor structures is carried out, and the motor performance of the three rotor structure optimization schemes is compared, including electromagnetic performance, permanent magnet consumption, motor temperature distribution, etc. Finally, in order to verify the correctness of the theoretical analysis, a prototype is made and tested based on the above analysis. The results show that for the electromagnetic characteristics, when the motors with three different rotor structures meet the performance requirements, the no-load line back-EMF of the inset surface-mounted motor is the lowest, but the back-EMF harmonic content of the inset surface-mounted motor is the highest. The copper loss of the spoke-type motor is the smallest, the efficiency is the highest, and the power factor is the lowest. In addition, the surface-mounted motor has the least consumption of permanent magnets and is more economical. Regarding the temperature distribution, when the same heat dissipation system is used, the temperature of the spoke-type motor with minimum copper loss is the lowest.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanghui Du & Hui Li & Ruojin Jiang & Wanning Li & Shengli Hou, 2024. "Comprehensive Comparison of Different Rotor Structures of Low-Speed Permanent Magnet Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3300-:d:1429458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3300/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/13/3300/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3300-:d:1429458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.