Author
Listed:
- Shogo Uchiyama
(Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan
RWE Renewables Japan G.K., Marunouchi Trust Tower Main, 1-8-3 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 100-0005, Japan)
- Teruo Ohsawa
(Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)
- Hiroshi Asou
(International Meteorological & Oceanographic Consultants Co., Ltd., 9-9 Tsukiji 3-chome, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan)
- Mizuki Konagaya
(Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan
Rera Tech Inc., 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)
- Takeshi Misaki
(Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan
Rera Tech Inc., 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)
- Ryuzo Araki
(Japan Meteorological Corporation, Grand Front Osaka Tower-A 29F, 4-20 Ofukacho, Kita-Ku, Osaka 530-0011, Japan)
- Kohei Hamada
(E&E Solutions Inc., Akihabara UDX Building, 14-1 Sotokanda 4-chome, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 101-0021, Japan)
Abstract
Floating LiDAR systems (FLSs) may replace conventional offshore met masts, and they have been developed well in Europe. However, before using them in Japan, we must determine whether they demonstrate the same performance under the unique East-Asian meteorological and oceanographic conditions. Therefore, herein, we investigate the performance of FLSs by focusing on the differences among models. Four independent wind datasets from three FLSs were simultaneously verified against a reference met mast and vertical LiDAR at a Japanese site. The data availability was confirmed to vary from 62.7 to 98.0% over the period at 63 m. This was strongly affected by the system availability of the buoy and LiDAR, suggesting that buoy system robustness is key to better campaigns with higher data availability. The 10 min averaged wind speed and direction largely satisfied the Carbon Trust’s key performance indicators, with a low sensitivity to wave conditions depending on the buoy shape. The standard deviation of the wind speed and turbulence intensity had poorer accuracy than that of the 10 min averaged statistics because of the wave-induced buoy motion, especially for small buoys. In short, this paper provides an overview of a measurement by FLS in Japan. Also, the unique verification with multiple units suggests the need for a low-motion buoy or motion compensation to improve the measurement accuracy of the turbulence component.
Suggested Citation
Shogo Uchiyama & Teruo Ohsawa & Hiroshi Asou & Mizuki Konagaya & Takeshi Misaki & Ryuzo Araki & Kohei Hamada, 2024.
"Accuracy Verification of Multiple Floating LiDARs at the Mutsu-Ogawara Site,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-26, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3164-:d:1423582
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3164-:d:1423582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.