Author
Listed:
- Joylan Rao Erriah
(School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Pengfei Liu
(School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
- Serkan Turkmen
(School of Engineering, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)
Abstract
Dual-mode propellers, as propulsion and turbine devices, have found widespread application in renewable energy systems for marine vehicles, particularly in sailing boats and yachts. However, the existing dual-mode propellers in these contexts are typically chosen in an off-the-shelf manner, indicating a lack of hydrodynamic optimisation to enhance both the propulsion and energy generation efficiency in the same rotor. To address this limitation and furnish scientific validation of the design of a dual-mode propeller turbine rotor optimised to achieve a balanced performance in both propulsion and energy generation, rigorous experimentation was conducted using specialised software, Rotorysics 2019, and a case study vessel, the Princess Royale. Utilising prior experimental data for this propeller turbine, code validation was undertaken to ensure accurate prediction of the effects of the pitch, blade count and expanded area ratio on the performance in both modes. With the intention of achieving optimal power generation and propulsion efficiencies in conjunction with a single rotor, the findings reveal that the optimised fixed-pitch propeller exhibits dual functionality. They serve as both propulsion and tidal/current turbines with balanced efficiency. They are particularly suitable for low-speed vessels such as yachts anchored in currents or for sailboats utilising a propeller as a towed turbine. Through thorough testing and analysis, the concept of a dual-mode propeller turbine was feasible. Analysing them separately, in terms of the propulsion, the best geometry found through numerous tests of different expanded area ratios, blade number, pitch and speed was the 3-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, which achieved a propulsive efficiency of 54.33% (0.5433204) and a power coefficient of 0.291843. Conversely, if the focus was on power generation while maintaining excellent propulsive efficiency, the optimal geometry would be the 5-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, which offers a power coefficient of 0.348402 and a propulsive efficiency of 48.55% (0.48547). However, when using both power generation and propulsion as the criteria, the 5-blade, 0.6 pitch ratio, with an EAR of 0.387142, is superior, with balanced optimisation, offering a propulsive efficiency of 52.53% (0.52527) and a power coefficient of 0.319718. As expected, this encompasses a higher blade number for increased power generation efficiency and a higher pitch ratio for increased propulsive efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Joylan Rao Erriah & Pengfei Liu & Serkan Turkmen, 2024.
"Hydrodynamic Development and Optimisation of a Retrofittable Dual-Mode Propeller Turbine,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3138-:d:1422135
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:13:p:3138-:d:1422135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.