IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i11p2795-d1410291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Flow Analysis in Oilseed Sunflower Farms and Modeling with Artificial Neural Networks as Compared to Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (Case Study: Khoy County)

Author

Listed:
  • Hossein Lotfali Nezhad

    (Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5697194781, Iran)

  • Vali Rasooli Sharabiani

    (Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5697194781, Iran)

  • Javad Tarighi

    (Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5697194781, Iran)

  • Mohammad Tahmasebi

    (Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5697194781, Iran)

  • Ebrahim Taghinezhad

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Moghan College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5697194781, Iran
    Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, CK Norwida 25, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Antoni Szumny

    (Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, CK Norwida 25, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

The evaluation of energy input and output processes in agricultural systems is a crucial method for assessing sustainability levels within these systems. In this research, the investigation focused on the input and output energies and related indices in sunflower farms in Khoy County during the agricultural year 2017–2018. Data were collected from 140 sunflower producers through specialized questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Additionally, artificial neural networks (ANNs), specifically the multilayer perceptron, were employed to predict the output energy. The results revealed that a substantial portion of the total input energy was attributed to chemical nitrogen fertilizer (43.98%), consumable fuel (25.74%), and machinery (8.42%). The energy efficiency (energy ratio) in these agroecosystems was relatively low, measured at 1.57 for seed and 7.96 for seed and straw. These values should be improved. The energy efficiency in seed production was computed at 0.06 MJ·ha −1 , while, for the combined seeds and straw, it was 0.57 MJ·ha −1 . In particular, seed energy efficiency represents approximately 11% of the overall biological energy efficiency, highlighting that a substantial 89% of the produced energy is associated with straw. The proper use of this straw is crucial, as its improper handling could lead to a drastic decrease in overall efficiency. Furthermore, the explanatory coefficient ( R 2 ) and the mean absolute percentage error ( MAPE ) to predict the output energy with the best neural network were 0.94, and 1.77 for the training data, 0.97 and 1.55 for the test data, and 0.9 and 2.08 for the validation data, respectively; additionally, 0.97 and 0.42 were obtained by an ANFIS.

Suggested Citation

  • Hossein Lotfali Nezhad & Vali Rasooli Sharabiani & Javad Tarighi & Mohammad Tahmasebi & Ebrahim Taghinezhad & Antoni Szumny, 2024. "Energy Flow Analysis in Oilseed Sunflower Farms and Modeling with Artificial Neural Networks as Compared to Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (Case Study: Khoy County)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2795-:d:1410291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2795-:d:1410291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.