Author
Listed:
- Xiaoming Wang
(PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China)
- Pingchuan Dong
(State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China
College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China)
- Youheng Zhang
(State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China
College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China)
- Xiaodong Gao
(Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Beijing 100083, China)
- Shun Chen
(State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China
College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102200, China)
- Ming Tian
(PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China)
- Yongxing Cui
(PetroChina Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China)
Abstract
As the wellbore pressure falls below the bubble point pressure, the light components in the oil phase are liberated, forming additional vapor, and the single-phase flow becomes a gas–liquid two-phase flow. However, most studies simplify the multiphase flow to a single-phase flow to study asphaltene deposition in wellbores. This assumption under multiphase conditions may lead to inaccurate prediction results and a substantial economic and operational burden for the oil and gas industry. Therefore, it is crucial to predict the deposition rate of asphaltene in a multiphase flow to assist in minimizing this issue. To do so, the volume of fluid coupling level-set (VOSET) model was used to obtain the flow pattern (bubble, slug, churn, and annular) in the current work. In the next step, the VOSET + k-ε turbulent + DPM models were used to simulate asphaltene deposition in a multiphase flow. Finally, the effects of different parameters, such as the gas superficial velocity, liquid superficial velocity, particle diameter, interfacial tension, viscosity, and average deposition rate, were investigated. The findings revealed that the maximum average deposition rate of asphaltene particles in a bubble flow is 1.35, 1.62, and 2 times that of a slug flow, churning flow, and annular mist flow, respectively. As the apparent velocity of the gas phase escalates from 0.5 m/s to 4 m/s, the average deposition rate experiences an increase of 82%. Similarly, when the apparent velocity of the liquid phase rises from 1 m/s to 5 m/s, the average deposition rate is amplified by a factor of 2.1. An increase in particle diameter from 50 μm to 400 μm results in a 27% increase in the average deposition rate. When the oil–gas interfacial tension is augmented from 0.02 n/m to 0.1 n/m, the average deposition rate witnesses an 18% increase. Furthermore, an increase in crude oil viscosity from 0.012 mPa·s to 0.06 mPa·s leads to a 34% increase in the average deposition rate. These research outcomes contribute to a deeper understanding of the asphaltene deposition problem under multiphase flow conditions and offer fresh perspectives on the asphaltene deposition issue in the oil and gas industry.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoming Wang & Pingchuan Dong & Youheng Zhang & Xiaodong Gao & Shun Chen & Ming Tian & Yongxing Cui, 2023.
"Simulation of the Asphaltene Deposition Rate in Oil Wells under Different Multiphase Flow Condition,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:121-:d:1307072
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:121-:d:1307072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.