IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1970-d1070704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Pump-In Flowback Model Verification with In-Situ Strain Measurements and Numerical Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Eltaleb

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Houston, Houston, TX 77023, USA)

  • Mohamed Y. Soliman

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, The University of Houston, Houston, TX 77023, USA)

Abstract

This study presents an analytical model for estimating minimum horizontal stress in hydraulic fracturing stimulations. The conventional Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) is not practical in ultra-tight formations, leading to the need for pump-in/flowback tests. However, ambiguities in the results of these tests have limited their application. The proposed model is based on the linear diffusivity equation and material balance, which is analytically solved and verified using a commercially available numerical simulator. The model generates a linear graph in which the pressure drop and its derivative are plotted versus the developed solution time function. The closure pressure is determined when the slope of the derivative deviates from linearity. The model was applied to several cycles of field flowback tests and found to eliminate the ambiguity associated with identifying the fracture closure. Furthermore, the minimum In-situ stresses estimated using this approach are verified via downhole strain measurement and synthetic data from a fully 3D commercial fracturing simulator. The proposed technique outperformed other conventional methods in analyzing challenging injection/shut-in tests, showing improved results and reducing uncertainty in estimated fracture parameters. This model is expected to scale down the need for multiple field trials and provide a reliable estimation of minimum stress.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Eltaleb & Mohamed Y. Soliman, 2023. "New Pump-In Flowback Model Verification with In-Situ Strain Measurements and Numerical Simulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1970-:d:1070704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1970-:d:1070704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.