IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1153-d1042567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Simulation Using Modern Data Assimilation Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Tuczyński

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
    PGNiG Upstream Norway AS, Moseidsletta 122, 4033 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Jerzy Stopa

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Production forecasting using numerical simulation has become a standard in the oil and gas industry. The model construction process requires an explicit definition of multiple uncertain parameters; thus, the outcome of the modelling is also uncertain. For the reservoirs with production data, the uncertainty can be reduced by history-matching. However, the manual matching procedure is time-consuming and usually generates one deterministic realization. Due to the ill-posed nature of the calibration process, the uncertainty cannot be captured sufficiently with only one simulation model. In this paper, the uncertainty quantification process carried out for a gas-condensate reservoir is described. The ensemble-based uncertainty approach was used with the ES-MDA algorithm, conditioning the models to the observed data. Along with the results, the author described the solutions proposed to improve the algorithm’s efficiency and to analyze the factors controlling modelling uncertainty. As a part of the calibration process, various geological hypotheses regarding the presence of an active aquifer were verified, leading to important observations about the drive mechanism of the analyzed reservoir.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Tuczyński & Jerzy Stopa, 2023. "Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Simulation Using Modern Data Assimilation Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1153-:d:1042567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1153-:d:1042567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.