IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i19p6954-d1253865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Evaluation of Geomechanical Risks in CO 2 Storage: An Exploration of Caprock Integrity Metrics Using a Multilaminate Model

Author

Listed:
  • Si-Yong Lee

    (SLB New Energy, Denver, CO 80202, USA)

  • Farid Reza Mohamed

    (SLB Digital & Integration, Houston, TX 77042, USA)

  • Kwang-Ho Lee

    (SLB Abingdon Technology Center, Abingdon OX14 4RU, UK)

  • Brian McPherson

    (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • Robert Balch

    (Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801, USA)

  • Sangcheol Yoon

    (SLB Doll Research Center, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA)

Abstract

The probabilistic uncertainty assessment of geomechanical risk—specifically, caprock failure—attributable to CO 2 injection, as presented in a simplified hypothetical geological model, was the focus of this study. Our approach amalgamates the implementation of a multilaminate model, the creation of a response surface model in conjunction with the Box–Behnken sampling design, the execution of associated numerical modeling experiments, and the utilization of Monte Carlo simulations. Probability distributions to encapsulate the inherent variability (elastic and mechanical properties of the caprock and reservoir) and uncertainty in prediction estimates (vertical displacement, total strain, and F value) were employed. Our findings reveal that the Young modulus of the caprock is a key factor controlling equivalent total strain but is insufficient as a stand-alone indicator of caprock integrity. It is confirmed that the caprock can accommodate significant deformation without failure, if it possesses a low Young’s modulus and high mechanical strength properties, such as the friction angle and uniaxial compressive strength. Similarly, vertical displacement was found to be an unreliable indicator for caprock integrity, as caprock failure can occur across a broad spectrum of vertical displacements, particularly when both the Young modulus and mechanical strength properties have wide ranges. This study introduces the F value as the most dependable indicator for caprock failure, although it is a theoretical attribute (the shortest distance between the Mohr circle and the nearest failure envelope used to measure the sensitivity to failure) and not physically measurable in the field. Deviatoric stress levels were found to vary based on stress regimes, with the maximum levels observed under extensive and compressive stress regimes. In conjunction with the use of the response surface method, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the multilaminate framework and the Mohr–Coulomb constitutive model in providing a simplified, yet effective, probabilistic model of the mechanical behavior of caprock failure, reducing mathematical and computational complexities.

Suggested Citation

  • Si-Yong Lee & Farid Reza Mohamed & Kwang-Ho Lee & Brian McPherson & Robert Balch & Sangcheol Yoon, 2023. "Probabilistic Evaluation of Geomechanical Risks in CO 2 Storage: An Exploration of Caprock Integrity Metrics Using a Multilaminate Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6954-:d:1253865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/19/6954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Si-Yong Lee & Ken Hnottavange-Telleen & Wei Jia & Ting Xiao & Hari Viswanathan & Shaoping Chu & Zhenxue Dai & Feng Pan & Brian McPherson & Robert Balch, 2021. "Risk Assessment and Management Workflow—An Example of the Southwest Regional Partnership," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Ting & Chen, Ting & Ma, Zhiwei & Tian, Hailong & Meguerdijian, Saro & Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh & Huang, Lianjie & Xu, Tianfu & Cather, Martha & McPherson, Brian, 2024. "A review of risk and uncertainty assessment for geologic carbon storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    2. William Ampomah & Brian McPherson & Robert Balch & Reid Grigg & Martha Cather, 2022. "Forecasting CO 2 Sequestration with Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-7, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:19:p:6954-:d:1253865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.