IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6668-d1241795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Poverty—Do Energy Companies Care? Study Results from European Energy Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Janusz Reichel

    (University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of City and Regional Department, 90-136 Lodz, Poland)

  • Agata Rudnicka

    (University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of Logistics, 90-136 Lodz, Poland)

  • Błażej Socha

    (University of Lodz, Faculty of Management, Department of Corporate Finance Management, 90-136 Lodz, Poland)

Abstract

Energy poverty is one of the most critical social challenges in the debate about energy transformation. Reducing the risk of this challenge and mitigating the effects are at the heart of public policies. However, not only the government sector can support people who experience or are at risk of energy poverty. The business sector, especially energy companies, which are the main actors in predefining energy systems in individual countries, can actively participate in this process, among others, through socially responsible activities. The article aims to examine to what extent the problem of energy poverty is an element of social responsibility projects undertaken by energy companies. In addition, it was examined to what extent national climate policies address this issue. The study was conducted using content analysis. The results indicate energy companies’ weak interest and engagement in the energy poverty problem. They treat it very peripherally and do not include material topics on the list. The article ends with a set of conclusions for business sector representatives to help develop projects supporting energy poverty combat.

Suggested Citation

  • Janusz Reichel & Agata Rudnicka & Błażej Socha, 2023. "Energy Poverty—Do Energy Companies Care? Study Results from European Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6668-:d:1241795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6668/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6668/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keith J. Baker & Ronald Mould & Scott Restrick, 2018. "Rethink fuel poverty as a complex problem," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 610-612, August.
    2. Elżbieta Izabela Szczepankiewicz & Przemysław Mućko, 2016. "CSR Reporting Practices of Polish Energy and Mining Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Le Thanh Tiep & Ngo Quang Huan & Tran Thi Thuy Hong, 2021. "Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Sustainable Energy Development in Emerging Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 172-186.
    4. José Andrade & José Puppim de Oliveira, 2015. "The Role of the Private Sector in Global Climate and Energy Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 375-387, August.
    5. Chiara Certomà & Filippo Corsini & Marina Di Giacomo & Marco Guerrazzi, 2023. "Beyond Income and Inequality: The Role of Socio-political Factors for Alleviating Energy Poverty in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 167-208, September.
    6. Amie Gaye, 2007. "Access to Energy and Human Development," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2007-25, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    7. Jochen Markard, 2018. "The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 628-633, August.
    8. Ait Sidhoum, Amer & Serra, Teresa, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility and dimensions of performance: An application to U.S. electric utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    9. George E. Halkos & Eleni-Christina Gkampoura, 2021. "Coping with Energy Poverty: Measurements, Drivers, Impacts, and Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    10. James Meadowcroft, 2009. "What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(4), pages 323-340, November.
    11. Jeffrey Unerman, 2000. "Methodological issues ‐ Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(5), pages 667-681, December.
    12. Barbara Kryk & Malgorzata K. Guzowska, 2023. "Assessing the Level of Energy Poverty Using a Synthetic Multidimensional Energy Poverty Index in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-31, January.
    13. Magdalena M. Stuss & Zbigniew J. Makieła & Agnieszka Herdan & Gabriela Kuźniarska, 2021. "The Corporate Social Responsibility of Polish Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    14. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570010353756 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Schumacher, Kira & Fichtner, Wolf, 2021. "Topic Modeling Uncovers Shifts in Media Framing of the German Renewable Energy Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 2(1).
    2. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Thomas Pownall & Iain Soutar & Catherine Mitchell, 2021. "Re-Designing GB’s Electricity Market Design: A Conceptual Framework Which Recognises the Value of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Löhr, Meike & Mattes, Jannika, 2022. "Facing transition phase two: Analysing actor strategies in a stagnating acceleration phase," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Scherhaufer, Patrick & Klittich, Philipp & Buzogány, Aron, 2021. "Between illegal protests and legitimate resistance. Civil disobedience against energy infrastructures," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Izabella Lecka & Janusz Gudowski & Tomasz Wołowiec, 2022. "CSR in Poland and the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in the Energy Sector during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Jasminka Young & Aleksandar Macura, 2023. "Forging Local Energy Transition in the Most Carbon-Intensive European Region of the Western Balkans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-29, February.
    9. Hanna E. Czaja-Cieszyńska & Dominika Kordela, 2023. "Sustainability Reporting in Energy Companies—Is There a Link between Social Disclosures, the Experience and Market Value?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Karaman, Abdullah S. & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali, 2020. "Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Turnheim, Bruno & Nykvist, Björn, 2019. "Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 775-788.
    12. Roman Tylżanowski & Katarzyna Kazojć & Ireneusz Miciuła, 2023. "Exploring the Link between Energy Efficiency and the Environmental Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study of International Companies in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.
    13. MacCarty, Nordica A. & Bryden, Kenneth Mark, 2016. "An integrated systems model for energy services in rural developing communities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 536-557.
    14. Patrick Mukumba & Shylet Y. Chivanga, 2023. "An Overview of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa and the Rural Households’ Energy Poverty Coping Strategies," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Giorgia Silvestri & Julia M. Wittmayer & Karlijn Schipper & Robinah Kulabako & Sampson Oduro-Kwarteng & Philip Nyenje & Hans Komakech & Roel Van Raak, 2018. "Transition Management for Improving the Sustainability of WASH Services in Informal Settlements in Sub-Saharan Africa—An Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    16. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Bazilian, Morgan & Griffiths, Steve & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife & Rooney, David, 2021. "Decarbonizing the food and beverages industry: A critical and systematic review of developments, sociotechnical systems and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    19. Li, Aitong & Xu, Yuan & Shiroyama, Hideaki, 2019. "Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Yana Us & Tetyana Pimonenko & Oleksii Lyulyov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Renewable Energy Development for the Green Brand within SDGs: A Meta-Analytic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6668-:d:1241795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.