Techniques of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring in Jet Engine Nozzles: A Review

Thrust vectoring innovations are demonstrated ideas that improve the projection of aerospace power with enhanced maneuverability, control effectiveness, survivability, performance, and stealth. Thrust vector control systems following a variety of concepts have been considered for modern aircraft and missiles to enhance their military performance. Short Take-off and Landing (STOL) and control effectiveness at lower aircraft speeds can be achieved by employing Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Control (FTVC). This paper summarizes a range of ideas for FTVC that have been designed and tested both computationally and experimentally to determine the thrust vectoring performance of supersonic propulsion system nozzles. The conventional method of thrust vectoring involves mechanical means to deflect the direction of flow of the exhaust gases, whereas the most recent method involves fluidic-based thrust vectoring techniques. Fluid-based thrust vectoring has the advantages of simplicity and low weight over mechanical-based thrust vectoring, which has complex geometry and adds extra weight to the aircraft. The fluidic vectoring control nozzles are divided into seven categories: shock vector, bypass shock vector, counterflow, co-flow, throat skewing, dual throat, and bypass dual throat nozzle control. This paper provides a summary of each fluidic thrust vectoring technique with its characteristics, design, classification, and different operational criteria developed to date and compares the intrinsic characteristics of each technique. Based on the present literature, it is concluded that among all the fluidic control techniques, the bypass dual-throat nozzle control can achieve better thrust vectoring performance with large vector angles and low thrust loss.