IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i12p4539-d1164621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation Method of Comprehensive Performance of Retrofitted CHP District Heating Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Daokun Chong

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Haizhu Zhou

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Xiaoping Li

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Lining Zhou

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Yitong Li

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

  • Mingda An

    (China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China)

Abstract

There is a big wave in China of retrofitting single-purpose coal-fired systems for district heating into heat-oriented combined heat and power (CHP) systems to save energy. Back-pressure steam turbines (BPSTs) and extraction steam turbines (ESTs) are both common in retrofitted systems, but contrastive analyses of their effects on the systems’ operation performance are lacking. Moreover, comprehensive evaluation methods of the retrofitted systems remain unknown. In this paper, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses were conducted to evaluate the thermodynamic, economic, and environmental performances of two real CHP systems: system A using a BPST and system B using an EST. Additionally, a new multi-criteria evaluation method based on rank correlation analysis was proposed for the retrofitted system. The results show that system A is better than system B in thermodynamic and environmental aspects but poorer in the economic aspect. Overall, the multi-criteria evaluation result indicates that system A has a better comprehensive performance than system B. Therefore, the BPST has a better effect than the EST on the retrofitted CHP system for district heating in this study. The findings could provide a reference point for retrofitting work in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Daokun Chong & Haizhu Zhou & Xiaoping Li & Lining Zhou & Yitong Li & Mingda An, 2023. "An Evaluation Method of Comprehensive Performance of Retrofitted CHP District Heating Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4539-:d:1164621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Kun & Ding, Yan & Zhu, Neng & Yang, Fan & Wang, Qiaochu, 2018. "Multi-criteria integrated evaluation of distributed energy system for community energy planning based on improved grey incidence approach: A case study in Tianjin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 352-363.
    2. Zheng, Guozhong & Li, Feng & Tian, Zhe & Zhu, Neng & Li, Qianru & Zhu, Han, 2012. "Operation strategy analysis of a geothermal step utilization heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 458-468.
    3. Meyer, Lutz & Tsatsaronis, George & Buchgeister, Jens & Schebek, Liselotte, 2009. "Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 75-89.
    4. Lozano, M.A. & Valero, A., 1993. "Theory of the exergetic cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 939-960.
    5. Gao, Jintong & Zhang, Qi & Wang, Xiaozhuang & Song, Dayong & Liu, Weiqi & Liu, Wenchao, 2018. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses with modeling for CO2 allocation of coal-fired CHP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 562-575.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco F. Torchio, 2013. "Energy-Exergy, Environmental and Economic Criteria in Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Plants: Indexes for the Evaluation of the Cogeneration Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Zhang, Qi & Gao, Jintong & Wang, Yujie & Wang, Lin & Yu, Zaihai & Song, Dayong, 2019. "Exergy-based analysis combined with LCA for waste heat recovery in coal-fired CHP plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 247-262.
    3. Cassetti, G. & Rocco, M.V. & Colombo, E., 2014. "Exergy based methods for economic and risk design optimization of energy systems: Application to a gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 269-279.
    4. Tsatsaronis, George, 2024. "The future of exergy-based methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    5. Kanbur, Baris Burak & Xiang, Liming & Dubey, Swapnil & Choo, Fook Hoong & Duan, Fei, 2017. "Cold utilization systems of LNG: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1171-1188.
    6. Rosseto de Faria, Pedro & Aiolfi Barone, Marcelo & Guedes dos Santos, Rodrigo & Santos, José Joaquim C.S., 2023. "The environment as a thermoeconomic diagram device for the systematic and automatic waste and environmental cost internalization in thermal systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Catrini, P. & Cellura, M. & Guarino, F. & Panno, D. & Piacentino, A., 2018. "An integrated approach based on Life Cycle Assessment and Thermoeconomics: Application to a water-cooled chiller for an air conditioning plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 72-86.
    8. Banerjee, A. & Tierney, M., 2011. "Comparison of five exergoenvironmental methods applied to candidate energy systems for rural villages in developing countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2650-2661.
    9. Teles dos Santos, Moisés & Park, Song Won, 2013. "Sustainability and biophysics basis of technical and economic processes: A survey of the reconciliation by thermodynamics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 261-271.
    10. Beretta, Gian Paolo & Iora, Paolo & Ghoniem, Ahmed F., 2014. "Allocating resources and products in multi-hybrid multi-cogeneration: What fractions of heat and power are renewable in hybrid fossil-solar CHP?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 587-603.
    11. Qian, Jiaxin & Wu, Jiahui & Yao, Lei & Mahmut, Saniye & Zhang, Qiang, 2021. "Comprehensive performance evaluation of Wind-Solar-CCHP system based on emergy analysis and multi-objective decision method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Lukas Kriechbaum & Philipp Gradl & Romeo Reichenhauser & Thomas Kienberger, 2020. "Modelling Grid Constraints in a Multi-Energy Municipal Energy System Using Cumulative Exergy Consumption Minimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Gad, M.S. & Uysal, Cuneyt & El-Shafay, A.S. & Ağbulut, Ümit, 2024. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic assessments of a diesel engine fuelled with waste chicken fat biodiesel-diesel blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    14. Yilmaz, Ceyhun & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of geothermal energy powered hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 592-602.
    15. Kwak, H.-Y. & Kim, D.-J. & Jeon, J.-S., 2003. "Exergetic and thermoeconomic analyses of power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 343-360.
    16. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    17. Picallo-Perez, Ana & Catrini, Pietro & Piacentino, Antonio & Sala, José-Mª, 2019. "A novel thermoeconomic analysis under dynamic operating conditions for space heating and cooling systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 819-837.
    18. Wang, Xurong & Yang, Yi & Zheng, Ya & Dai, Yiping, 2017. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of a supercritical CO2 cycle for a cogeneration application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 971-982.
    19. Palacios-Bereche, M.C. & Palacios-Bereche, R. & Ensinas, A.V. & Gallego, A. Garrido & Modesto, Marcelo & Nebra, S.A., 2022. "Brazilian sugar cane industry – A survey on future improvements in the process energy management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Gürbüz, Emine Yağız & Güler, Onur Vahip & Keçebaş, Ali, 2022. "Environmental impact assessment of a real geothermal driven power plant with two-stage ORC using enhanced exergo-environmental analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1110-1123.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:12:p:4539-:d:1164621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.