IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4430-d1160120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neutronic Assessments towards a Novel First Wall Design for a Stellarator Fusion Reactor with Dual Coolant Lithium Lead Breeding Blanket

Author

Listed:
  • David Sosa

    (Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Fusion Technology Division, Avenida Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Departamento de Ingeniería Energética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales UNED, Calle Juan del Rosal 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Iole Palermo

    (Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Fusion Technology Division, Avenida Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The Stellarator Power Plant Studies Prospective R&D Work Package in the Eurofusion Programme was settled to bring the stellarator engineering to maturity, so that stellarators and particularly the HELIAS (HELical-axis Advanced Stellarator) configuration could be a possible alternative to tokamaks. However, its complex geometry makes designing a Breeding Blanket (BB) that fully satisfies the requirements for such a HELIAS configuration, which is a difficult task. Taking advantage of the acquired experience in BB design for DEMO tokamak, CIEMAT is leading the development of a Dual Coolant Lithium Lead (DCLL) BB for a HELIAS configuration. To answer the specific HELIAS challenges, new and advanced solutions have been proposed, such as the use of fully detached First Wall (FW) based on liquid metal Capillary Porous Systems (CPS). The proposed solutions have been studied in a simplified 1D model that can help to estimate the relative variations in Tritium Breeding Ratio (TBR) and displacement per atom (dpa) to verify their effectiveness in simplifying the BB integration and improving the machine availability while keeping the main BB nuclear functions (i.e., tritium breeding, heat extraction and shielding). This preliminary study demonstrates that the use of FW CPS would drastically reduce the radiation damage received by the blanket by 29% in some of the selected configurations along with a small decrease of 4.9% in TBR. This could even be improved to just a 3.8% TBR reduction by using a graphite reflector. Such an impact on the TBR is considered affordable, and the results presented, although preliminary in essence, have shown the existence of margins for further development of the FW CPS concept for HELIAS, as they have been not found, at least to date, to be significant showstoppers for the use of this technological solution.

Suggested Citation

  • David Sosa & Iole Palermo, 2023. "Neutronic Assessments towards a Novel First Wall Design for a Stellarator Fusion Reactor with Dual Coolant Lithium Lead Breeding Blanket," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4430-:d:1160120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Palermo, Iole & Alguacil, Javier & Pablo Catalán, Juan & Fernández-Berceruelo, Iván & Lion, Jorrit & Ángel Noguerón Valiente, Jose & Sosa, David & Rapisarda, David & Urgorri, Fernando R. & Warmer, Fel, 2024. "Challenges towards an acceleration in stellarator reactors engineering: The dual coolant lithium–lead breeding blanket helical-axis advanced stellarator case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4430-:d:1160120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.