IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2608-d786081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Comparison of LMNO Cathodes Produced with Pullulan or PEDOT:PSS Water-Processable Binders

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandro Brilloni

    (Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Francesco Marchesini

    (Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Federico Poli

    (Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Elisabetta Petri

    (Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Francesca Soavi

    (Department of Chemistry “Giacomo Ciamician”, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    ENERCube, Centro Ricerche Energia, Ambiente e Mare, Centro Interdipartimentale per la Ricerca Industriale Fonti Rinnovabili, Ambiente, Mare ed Energia (CIRI-FRAME), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Viale Ciro Menotti 48, 48122 Marina di Ravenna, Italy
    National Reference Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage (GISEL)-INSTM, Via G. Giusti 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate lithium metal battery cells assembled with high potential cathodes produced by sustainable processes. Specifically, LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LMNO) electrodes were fabricated using two different water-processable binders: pullulan (PU) or the bifunctional electronically conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS). The cell performance was evaluated by voltammetric and galvanostatic charge/discharge cycles at different C-rates with 1M LiPF 6 in 1:1 ( v : v ) ethylene carbonate (EC):dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (LP30) electrolyte and compared to that of cells assembled with LMNO featuring poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVdF). At C/10, the specific capacity of LMNO-PEDOT:PSS and LMNO-PU were, respectively, 130 mAh g −1 and 127 mAh g −1 , slightly higher than that of LMNO-PVdF (124 mAh g −1 ). While the capacity retention at higher C-rates and under repeated cycling of LMNO-PU and LMNO-PVdF electrodes was similar, LMNO-PEDOT:PSS featured superior performance. Indeed, lithium metal cells assembled with PEDOT:PSS featured a capacity retention of 100% over 200 cycles carried out at C/1 and with a high cut-off voltage of 5 V. Overall, this work demonstrates that both the water-processable binders are a valuable alternative to PVdF. In addition, the use of PEDOT:PSS significantly improves the cycle life of the cell, even when high-voltage cathodes are used, therefore demonstrating the feasibility of the production of a green lithium metal battery that can exhibit a specific energy of 400 Wh kg −1 , evaluated at the electrode material level. Our work further demonstrates the importance of the use of functional binders in electrode manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandro Brilloni & Francesco Marchesini & Federico Poli & Elisabetta Petri & Francesca Soavi, 2022. "Performance Comparison of LMNO Cathodes Produced with Pullulan or PEDOT:PSS Water-Processable Binders," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2608-:d:786081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2608/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2608/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giovanni Emanuele Spina & Federico Poli & Alessandro Brilloni & Daniele Marchese & Francesca Soavi, 2020. "Natural Polymers for Green Supercapacitors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2608-:d:786081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.