Author
Listed:
- Aspari Kumara Swamy
(Department of Fuel, Mineral and Metallurgical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India)
- Suresh Nikkam
(Department of Fuel, Mineral and Metallurgical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (ISM), Dhanbad 826004, India)
- Palthur Sharath Kumar
(Department of Mineral Processing, Vijayanagara Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Ballari 583119, India)
Abstract
The greater demand for high-quality iron ores has forced the iron and steel industries to utilize low-grade iron ores, such as banded hematite quartzite (BHQ). In the present work, a striped hematite quartzite sample from the Haraginadoni area, in the Sandur schist belt, Ballari District, Karnataka, India, was subjected to characterization studies and conventional mineral processing methods to produce pellet-grade concentrate, assayed as Fe > 63.0%, SiO 2 + Al 2 O 3 < 7%, (Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 < 0.5). The sample was analyzed as 35.70% Fe, 47.44% SiO 2 , 0.75% Al 2 O 3 , 0.06% Mn, 0.07% TiO 2 , 0.03% P, 0.02% S, and 0.83% LOI. We focused on two routes of beneficiating BHQ samples: (1) conventional gravity followed by reverse floatation and (2) magnetic separation followed by cleaning of magnetic concentrate by reverse floatation. Route 1, achieved pellet-grade concentrate through assaying, and was 63.73% Fe, 6.20% SiO 2 , 0.19% Al 2 O 3 , 0.03% Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 , and 0.23% LOI, D 80 45 µm, with 70.1% Fe recovery and 62.8% concentration efficiency at 39.6 wt% yield. Using Route 2, the process consisted of WHIMS at −74 µm, D 80 54 µm, 10,000 Gauss, and with a 3 mm ball matrix, followed by flotation of the WHIMS concentrate, which produced a concentrate through assaying and was 63.34% Fe, 6.30% SiO 2 , 0.20% Al 2 O 3 (0.03 Al 2 O 3 /SiO 2 ), and 0.20% LOI with 77.4% Fe recovery, achieving a 68.8% concentration efficiency at 44.0 wt% yield, meeting pellet-grade specifications. Comparing and analyzing both routes for the concentration methods, Route 2, i.e., WHIMS and the reverse flotation of WHIMS concentrate, was amenable compared to Route 1.
Suggested Citation
Aspari Kumara Swamy & Suresh Nikkam & Palthur Sharath Kumar, 2022.
"Processing Studies on Banded Hematite Quartzite’s of Sandur Sciht, Karnataka, India,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2542-:d:783737
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2542-:d:783737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.