IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1109-d740980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wave Resource Assessments: Spatiotemporal Impacts of WEC Size and Wave Spectra on Power Conversion

Author

Listed:
  • Gabrielle Dunkle

    (School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1791 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA)

  • Shangyan Zou

    (School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1791 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA)

  • Bryson Robertson

    (School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, 1791 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA)

Abstract

Wave energy has the potential to power significant portions of economies around the world. Standard International Electrotechnical Commission methods for determining wave energy quantifies the gross wave resource available in the ocean, yet a significant portion of this resource is not usable by specific wave energy converters (WECs). This can provide a misleading assessment of the spatiotemporal opportunities for wave energy in deployment locations. Therefore, there is a need to develop a new technique to assess potential wave power from a device point of view that is generally applicable across WEC sizes. To address this challenge, a novel net power assessment methodology is proposed, which implements Budal’s upper bound (which describes the power available to a WEC based on its stroke), the radiation power limit (which describes the maximum radiation-based amount of wave power a WEC can absorb), and total gross incident wave power as absorbable power upper bounds. Spatiotemporal opportunities for WECs were re-evaluated based on this new technique. Numerical simulations were conducted to quantify the net wave resource available for different sized WECs (1, 2, 5, 10) at five different ocean sites in the U.S. based on wave data. The simulation results show the predicted potential wave power through the net power assessment for a 5 m device is 0.8% of the International Electrotechnical Commission assessment results at PacWave, Oregon. For the monthly average power, the results show PacWave has the most energetic wave resource (up to 406 kW in January) and WETS, Hawaii, has the steadiest wave power available (maximum COV of 0.8) among the sites. Regarding the size of the devices, results show that larger devices (e.g., 10 m) have better performance in terms of both magnitude and steadiness of power available at WETS and Los Angeles, California. Finally, the wave power potential of different sized WECs at varying locations was compared at a 3-h resolution. The maximum instantaneous power available for a 1 and 10 m device at PacWave throughout the time period was 47.8 and 3.52 × 10 3 kW, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabrielle Dunkle & Shangyan Zou & Bryson Robertson, 2022. "Wave Resource Assessments: Spatiotemporal Impacts of WEC Size and Wave Spectra on Power Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1109-:d:740980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zou, Shangyan & Robertson, Bryson & Roach, Aeron & Mundon, Tim & Rosenberg, Brian & Penalba, Markel, 2024. "Wave energy converter arrays: A methodology to assess performance considering the disturbed wave field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Zou, Shangyan & Robertson, Bryson & Paudel, Sanjaya, 2023. "Geospatial Analysis of Technical U.S. Wave Net Power Potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 725-736.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1109-:d:740980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.