IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p636-d726451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Design and Performance Analysis of 10 kW Rare-Earth and Non-Rare Earth Flux Reversal Wind Generators

Author

Listed:
  • Manne Bharathi

    (Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educational Foundation, Guntur 522502, India)

  • Udochukwu Bola Akuru

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria 0183, South Africa)

  • Malligunta Kiran Kumar

    (Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Educational Foundation, Guntur 522502, India)

Abstract

Generators are a key technological element of the wind energy generation system. Currently, there is an increasing interest in adopting non-conventional stator-mounted permanent magnet generators, e.g., flux reversal generators (FRGs), which is a good alternative to conventional synchronous generators for medium-speed wind turbine generator applications. The usage of FRG with rare-earth (RE) permanent magnets (PMs) is increasing due to their high efficiency and high power density factors. However, RE PMs are unattractive to wind generators in terms of their cost and unpredictable market supply. In this paper, an attempt is made to study the potential of FRG with non-rare earths (ferrite PMs) for wind generators. The three-phase, 6/8 pole FRG is designed and compared with RE and NRE PMs for wind generator application at 375 r/min, 10 kW. Using 2D FEA, both the generators are compared in terms of their power generating performance with excellent overload capability. It shows that the average efficiency of the generators is approximately similar, but the torque density of NRE-FRG is only 51% that of RE-FRG. The NRE-FRG design is heavier, with the total active mass being 2.6 times higher than the RE-FRG, but with the estimated total active material cost of both generators almost the same. Moreover, the toque ripple for RE-FRG is 64% higher than for NRE-FRG. The demagnetization risk analysis was performed, and it is found that at higher temperatures, RE-FRG structures are prone to higher demagnetization risks, while it is much lower in NRE-FRGs. In summary, it is found that NRE-FRG is a suitable alternative to RE-FRG for medium-speed wind turbine generator applications in the 10-kW power range.

Suggested Citation

  • Manne Bharathi & Udochukwu Bola Akuru & Malligunta Kiran Kumar, 2022. "Comparative Design and Performance Analysis of 10 kW Rare-Earth and Non-Rare Earth Flux Reversal Wind Generators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:636-:d:726451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:636-:d:726451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.