Author
Listed:
- Shiqi Liu
(School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China)
- Yuyang Liu
(School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
- Xiaowei Zhang
(PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
- Wei Guo
(PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
- Lixia Kang
(PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
- Rongze Yu
(PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
- Yuping Sun
(PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
China National Shale Gas Research and Development (Experiment) Center, Langfang 065007, China)
Abstract
As an emerging unconventional energy resource, shale gas has great resource potential and developmental prospects. The effective evaluation of geological sweet spots (GSS), engineering sweet spots (ESS) and comprehensive sweet spots (CSS) is one of the main factors for a high-yield scale and economic production of shale gas. Sweet spot evaluation involves a comprehensive analysis based on multiple parameters. Conventional evaluation methods consider relatively simple or single factors. Although the main influencing factors are understood, the influence of different factors is as of yet unknown, and a comprehensive consideration may strongly affect the evaluation results. In this paper, the fuzzy mathematics method is introduced for shale gas sweet spot evaluation. With the help of fuzzy mathematics tools, such as membership function, the objective of comprehensive sweet spots evaluation based on multiple parameters is realized. Additionally, the reliability of the evaluation of sweet spots is improved. Firstly, previous research results are used for reference, and the evaluation factor system of geological and engineering sweet spots of shale gas is systematically analyzed and established. Then, the basic principle of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is briefly introduced, and a geological engineering integrated shale gas sweet spots evaluation method, based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, is designed and implemented. Finally, the data from HB blocks in the Z shale gas field in China are adopted. According to the evaluation results, the modified method is tested. The results show that the method proposed in this paper can synthesize a number of evaluation indices, quickly and effectively evaluate the GSS, ESS and CSS in the target area, and the results have high rationality and accuracy, which can effectively assist in well-pattern deployment and fracture design.
Suggested Citation
Shiqi Liu & Yuyang Liu & Xiaowei Zhang & Wei Guo & Lixia Kang & Rongze Yu & Yuping Sun, 2022.
"Geological and Engineering Integrated Shale Gas Sweet Spots Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method: A Case Study of Z Shale Gas Field HB Block,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:602-:d:725303
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:602-:d:725303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.