IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p483-d721783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Saeed Khaled

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt)

  • Ibrahim Abdelfadeel Shaban

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt
    Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999666, China)

  • Ahmed Karam

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Banha, Cairo 11629, Egypt
    Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Mohamed Hussain

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt)

  • Ismail Zahran

    (Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Helwan, Cairo 11795, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Hussein

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999666, China)

Abstract

Sustainability has become of great interest in many fields, especially in production systems due to the continual increase in the scarcity of raw materials and environmental awareness. Recent literature has given significant attention to considering the three sustainability pillars (i.e., environmental, economic, and social sustainability) in solving production planning problems. Therefore, the present study conducts a review of the literature on sustainable production planning to analyze the relationships among different production planning problems (e.g., scheduling, lot sizing, aggregate planning, etc.) and the three sustainability pillars. In addition, we analyze the identified studies based on the indicators that define each pillar. The results show that the literature most frequently addresses production scheduling problems while it lacks studies on aggregate production planning problems that consider the sustainability pillars. In addition, there is a growing trend towards obtaining integrated solutions of different planning problems, e.g., combining production planning problems with maintenance planning or energy planning. Additionally, around 45% of the identified studies considered the integration of the economic and the environmental pillars in different production planning problems. In addition, energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are the most frequent sustainability indicators considered in the literature, while less attention has been given to social indicators. Another issue is the low number of studies that have considered all three sustainability pillars simultaneously. The finidings highlight the need for more future research towards holistic sustainable production planning approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Saeed Khaled & Ibrahim Abdelfadeel Shaban & Ahmed Karam & Mohamed Hussain & Ismail Zahran & Mohamed Hussein, 2022. "An Analysis of Research Trends in the Sustainability of Production Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:483-:d:721783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2021. "Fuzzy Inference Model for Decision Support in Sustainable Production Planning Processes—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2022. "Problems, Needs, and Challenges of a Sustainability-Based Production Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Massimo Bertolini & Francesco Leali & Davide Mezzogori & Cristina Renzi, 2023. "A Keyword, Taxonomy and Cartographic Research Review of Sustainability Concepts for Production Scheduling in Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Borna Dasović & Uroš Klanšek, 2022. "A Review of Energy-Efficient and Sustainable Construction Scheduling Supported with Optimization Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Walter Cardoso Satyro & Jose Celso Contador & Sonia Francisca de Paula Monken & Anderson Ferreira de Lima & Gilberto Gomes Soares Junior & Jansen Anderson Gomes & João Victor Silva Neves & José Robert, 2023. "Industry 4.0 Implementation Projects: The Cleaner Production Strategy—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2022. "Problems, Needs, and Challenges of a Sustainability-Based Production Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Valentina De Simone & Valentina Di Pasquale & Maria Elena Nenni & Salvatore Miranda, 2023. "Sustainable Production Planning and Control in Manufacturing Contexts: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:483-:d:721783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.