IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i2p418-d719366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Comparison of Control Strategies for Plant-Wide Produced Water Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Leif Hansen

    (Department of Energy, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Mads Valentin Bram

    (Department of Energy, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Simon Pedersen

    (Department of Energy, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

  • Zhenyu Yang

    (Department of Energy, Aalborg University, Niels Bohrs vej 8, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark)

Abstract

Offshore produced water treatment (PWT) accounts for cleaning the largest waste stream in the offshore oil and gas industry. If this separation process is not properly executed, large amounts of oil are often directly discharged into the ocean. This work extends two grey-box models of a three-phase gravity separator and a deoiling hydrocyclone, and combines them into a single plant-wide model for testing PWT control solutions in a typical process configuration. In simulations, three known control solutions—proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control, H ∞ control, and model predictive control (MPC)—are compared on the combined model to evaluate the separation performance. The results of the simulations clearly show what performance metrics each controller excels at, such as valve wear, oil discharge, oil-in-water (OiW) concentration variance, and constraint violations. The work incentivizes future control to be based on operational policy, such as defining boundary constraints and weights on oil discharge, rather than maintaining conventional intermediate performance metrics, such as water level in the separation and pressure drop ratio (PDR) over the hydrocyclone.

Suggested Citation

  • Leif Hansen & Mads Valentin Bram & Simon Pedersen & Zhenyu Yang, 2022. "Performance Comparison of Control Strategies for Plant-Wide Produced Water Treatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:418-:d:719366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/418/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/2/418/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:418-:d:719366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.