Author
Listed:
- Menglei Cui
(Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Yizhen Wang
(Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Jiong Guo
(Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Han Zhang
(Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
- Fu Li
(Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Abstract
Quantifying fission product yield uncertainty contribution to reactor burnup calculation is an important aspect of pebble-bed High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (pebble-bed HTGR) uncertainty analysis. In this work, uncertainty propagation of fission product yield to pebble-bed HTGR burnup calculation is conducted. Uncertainty of fission product yields from four fissile isotopes, namely 233 U, 235 U, 239 Pu and 241 Pu, are considered. The stochastic sampling-based uncertainty analysis method is adopted and fission product yield covariance matrices are estimated from ENDF/B-VII.1. The covariance matrix for each fissile actinide is estimated based on the Bayesian method and fission product yields are assigned with log-normal distribution in the sampling process with the Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) method. Since the fission fraction from 239 Pu plays an important role in fissions of fuels with high burnup value in pebble-bed HTGR, the fission product yield uncertainty contribution from 239 Pu is highlighted in this work. The result shows that, in the burnup equilibrium state of pebble-bed HTGR, fission product yield uncertainty contributions from 235 U and 239 Pu to relative uncertainty of k eff are 0.027% and 0.026%, respectively. The overall uncertainty contribution from four fissile isotopes ( 233 U, 235 U, 239 Pu and 241 Pu) to relative uncertainty of equilibrium core k eff is 0.038%. Furthermore, fission product yield uncertainty has an important contribution to the nuclide density uncertainty of fission products. The most relative uncertainty, 10.82%, is observed in 109 Ag contributed from the fission product yield uncertainty of 239 Pu at the burnup equilibrium state. This indicates the uncertainty contribution from the fission product yield of 239 Pu cannot be neglected in pebble-bed HTGR burnup uncertainty analysis.
Suggested Citation
Menglei Cui & Yizhen Wang & Jiong Guo & Han Zhang & Fu Li, 2022.
"Uncertainty Propagation of Fission Product Yields from Uranium and Plutonium in Pebble-Bed HTGR Burnup Calculation,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8369-:d:967577
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8369-:d:967577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.