Author
Listed:
- Xincheng Wan
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
- Lu Jin
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
- Nicholas A. Azzolina
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
- Shane K. Butler
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
- Xue Yu
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
- Jin Zhao
(National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
Energy & Environmental Research Center, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA)
Abstract
Reservoir simulation for unconventional reservoirs requires proper history matching (HM) to quantify the uncertainties of fracture properties and proper modeling methods to address complex fracture geometry. An integrated method, namely embedded discrete fracture model–artificial intelligence–automatic HM (EDFM–AI–AHM), was used to automatically generate HM solutions for a multistage hydraulic fracturing well in the Wolfcamp Formation. Thirteen scenarios with different combinations of matrix and fracture parameters as variables or fixed inputs were designed to generate 1300 reservoir simulations via EDFM–AI–AHM, from which 358 HM solutions were retained to reproduce production history and quantify the uncertainties of matrix and hydraulic fracture properties. The best HM solution was used for production forecasting and carbon dioxide (CO 2 )-enhanced oil recovery (EOR) strategy optimization. The results of the production forecast for primary recovery indicated that the drainage area for oil production was difficult to extend further into the low-permeability reservoir matrix. However, CO 2 EOR simulations showed that increasing the gas injection rate during the injection cycle promoted incremental oil production from the reservoir matrix, regardless of minimum miscibility pressure. A gas injection rate of 25 million standard cubic feet per day (MMscfd) resulted in a 14% incremental oil production improvement compared to the baseline scenario with no EOR. This paper demonstrates the utility of coupling reservoir simulation with artificial intelligence algorithms to generate ensembles of simulation cases that provide insights into the relationships between fracture network properties and production.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8266-:d:964021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.