IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7764-d948426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of LID and Electrical Injection Regeneration of PERC and Al-BSF Solar Cells from a Cz-Si Ingot

Author

Listed:
  • Siqi Ding

    (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Chen Yang

    (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Cheng Qin

    (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Bin Ai

    (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
    Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xiaopu Sun

    (CSG PVTECH Co., Ltd., Dongguan 523141, China)

  • Jianghai Yang

    (CSG PVTECH Co., Ltd., Dongguan 523141, China)

  • Quan Liu

    (CSG PVTECH Co., Ltd., Dongguan 523141, China)

  • Xueqin Liang

    (Yichang CSG Polysilicon Co., Ltd., Yichang 443007, China)

Abstract

In order to study the effect of device structures and silicon wafer positions on light-induced degradation (LID) and regeneration, five groups of industrial PERC and Al-BSF solar cells were fabricated by using silicon wafers from different positions of a B-doped Czochralski silicon (Cz-Si) ingot. Then, the cells were subjected to a dark annealing (200 °C, 30 min), the first LID (45 °C, 1 sun, 12 h), an electrical injection regeneration (175 °C, 18 A, 30 min) and the second LID (45 °C, 1 sun, 12 h) in order, and the variations of performance of the cells with processing time were measured. It was found that after the electrical injection regeneration, the efficiency losses of PERC cells decreased from 1.28–1.76% absolute in the first LID to 0.09–0.16% absolute in the second LID, while those of Al-BSF cells decreased from 0.3–0.66% absolute in the first LID to 0 in the second LID. The efficiency losses of PERC cells during the first LID were caused by the co-action of B-O-defect-induced LID (BO-LID) and dissociation of Fe-B pairs, and the latter contributed 5.81–9.56% of the efficiency loss, while those of Al-BSF cells during the first LID were almost contributed by BO-LID solely. For both kinds of cells, the cells made from the silicon wafers from middle of the ingot had the best performance throughout the experiment. In addition, the LID and regeneration treatments only affected the spectral response of the cells in the wavelength larger than 700 nm.

Suggested Citation

  • Siqi Ding & Chen Yang & Cheng Qin & Bin Ai & Xiaopu Sun & Jianghai Yang & Quan Liu & Xueqin Liang, 2022. "Comparison of LID and Electrical Injection Regeneration of PERC and Al-BSF Solar Cells from a Cz-Si Ingot," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7764-:d:948426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siqi Ding & Chen Yang & Shuai Yuan & Bin Ai & Cheng Qin & Zhengke Li & Yecheng Zhou & Xiaopu Sun & Jianghai Yang & Quan Liu & Xueqin Liang, 2022. "In-Situ LID and Regeneration of Al-BSF Solar Cells from Different Positions of a B-Doped Cz-Si Ingot," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oyeniyi A. Alimi & Edson L. Meyer & Olufemi I. Olayiwola, 2022. "Solar Photovoltaic Modules’ Performance Reliability and Degradation Analysis—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7764-:d:948426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.