IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i20p7624-d943282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation on Coalbed Methane Fracturing Using Supercritical CO 2 Graphene Cement Slurry System

Author

Listed:
  • Dongyuan Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Pingya Luo

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Xiaojun Peng

    (Wuhuan Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430223, China)

  • Tao Zou

    (Huabei Oilfield Company, China National Petroleum Corporation, Renqiu 062552, China)

  • Li Fu

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Wanchun Fu

    (Chengdu GSUN Energy Technology Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610219, China)

  • Gang Xie

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract

In this study, we innovatively use sulphoaluminate cement slurry and its additives as a fracturing fluid system for supercritical CO 2 graphene-permeable cement stone (referred to hereafter as the SCGPCS) fracturing without sand. Utilizing small fluid volumes, small displacement and small pump pressure, we obtain the success of the first field test in an extra-low desorption pressure coal seam. Laboratory experiments have proven that sulphoaluminate cement is suitable as base cements for the SCGPCS system due to their rapid setting and fast hardening characteristics. The reaction of sodium carbonate + aluminum sulfate system and sodium bicarbonate + aluminum sulfate system will generate precipitation to block the internal pore structure of cement stone, leading to a decrease in permeability. Calcium hypochlorite (1.5 wt.%) + urea (0.6 wt.%) system is preferred as a gas-generating agent system for SCGPCS. Sand (30 wt.%) with 300–425 μm particle size is preferred as a structural strength substance for SCGPCS. Graphene poly-gel (referred to hereafter as the GPG) has a high FCI and good CO 2 foam stability. GPG (6.0 wt.%) is preferred as a foam stabilizer for SCGPCS. The thickening time of graphene–foam–cement slurry is 138 min at 50 °C, with long pumping time, normal thickening curve and excellent performance. The SCGPCS has a corrosion rate of 11.25 mpy in the formation water and can be stable in the formation. Acid is more corrosive to SCGPCS, and it can be used to improve the permeability of SCGPCS. Field tests have proven that SCGPCS fracturing injected 33 m 3 of fluid, of which 27 m 3 entered the formation. Graphene–foam–cement slurry was injected into the formation through the casing for 13 m 3 , with a displacement of 0.4–0.6 m 3 /min and tubing pressure 8–13 MPa. The formation was fractured with a fracturing crack half-length of 71.58 m, a supported fracturing crack half-length of 56.95 m, and a supported fracturing crack permeability of 56.265 mD.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongyuan Li & Pingya Luo & Xiaojun Peng & Tao Zou & Li Fu & Wanchun Fu & Gang Xie, 2022. "Investigation on Coalbed Methane Fracturing Using Supercritical CO 2 Graphene Cement Slurry System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7624-:d:943282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7624/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/20/7624/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dapeng Gao & Yuewu Liu & Tianjiao Wang & Daigang Wang, 2018. "Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Coal Fines Migration on Coal Core Water Flooding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaowen Du & Shaojie Chen & Junbiao Ma & Zhongping Guo & Dawei Yin, 2020. "Gob-Side Entry Retaining Involving Bag Filling Material for Support Wall Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Ijaz Ahmad & Muhammad Tayyab & Muhammad Zaman & Muhammad Naveed Anjum & Xiaohua Dong, 2019. "Finite-Difference Numerical Simulation of Dewatering System in a Large Deep Foundation Pit at Taunsa Barrage, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:20:p:7624-:d:943282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.