IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i19p7368-d935572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analytical Hierarchy-Based Method for Quantifying Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulation to Improve Geothermal Well Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Qamar Yasin

    (College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
    Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-452 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Mariusz Majdański

    (Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 01-452 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Rizwan Sarwar Awan

    (School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Naser Golsanami

    (College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China)

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing (HF) has been used for years to enhance oil and gas production from conventional and unconventional reservoirs. HF in enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) has become increasingly common in recent years. In EGS, hydraulic fracturing creates a geothermal collector in impermeable or low-permeable hot dry rocks. Artificial fracture networks in the collector allow for a continuous flow of fluid in a loop connecting at least two wells (injector and producer). However, it is challenging to assess the fracability of geothermal reservoirs for EGS. Consequently, it is necessary to design a method that considers multiple parameters when evaluating the potential of geothermal development. This study proposes an improved fracability index model (FI) based on the influences of fracability-related geomechanical and petrophysical properties. These include brittle minerals composition, fracture toughness, minimum horizontal in-situ stress, a brittleness index model, and temperature effect to quantify the rock’s fracability. The hierarchical analytic framework was designed based on the correlation between the influencing factors and rock fracability. The results of the qualitative and quantitative approaches were integrated into a mathematical evaluation model. The improved fracability index model’s reliability was evaluated using well logs and 3D seismic data on low-permeable carbonate geothermal reservoirs and shale gas horizontal wells. The results reveal that the improved FI model effectively demonstrates brittle regions in the low-permeable carbonate geothermal reservoir and long horizontal section of shale reservoir. We divide the rock fracability into three levels: FI > 0.59 (the rock fracability is good); 0.59 > FI > 0.32 (the rock fracability is medium); and FI < 0.32, (the rock fracability is poor). The improved FI model can assist in resolving the uncertainties associated with fracability interpretation in determining the optimum location of perforation clusters for hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation in enhanced geothermal systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Qamar Yasin & Mariusz Majdański & Rizwan Sarwar Awan & Naser Golsanami, 2022. "An Analytical Hierarchy-Based Method for Quantifying Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulation to Improve Geothermal Well Productivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7368-:d:935572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7368/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:19:p:7368-:d:935572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.