Author
Listed:
- Zhenzhen Dong
(Petroleum Engineering Department, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)
- Lei Wu
(Petroleum Engineering Department, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)
- Linjun Wang
(Petroleum Engineering Department, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)
- Weirong Li
(Petroleum Engineering Department, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China)
- Zhengbo Wang
(Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)
- Zhaoxia Liu
(Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Oil production from tight oil reservoirs has become economically feasible because of the combination of horizontal drilling and multistage hydraulic fracturing. Optimal fracture design plays a critical role in successful economical production from a tight oil reservoir. However, many complex parameters such as fracture spacing and fracture half-length make fracturing treatments costly and uncertain. To improve fracture design, it is essential to determine reasonable ranges for these parameters and to evaluate their effects on well performance and economic feasibility. In traditional analytical and numerical simulation methods, many simplifications and assumptions are introduced for artificial fracture characterization and gas percolation mechanisms, and their implementation process remains complicated and computationally inefficient. Most previous studies on big data-driven fracturing parameter optimization have been based on only a single output, such as expected ultimate recovery, and few studies have integrated machine learning with evolutionary algorithms to optimize fracturing parameters based on time-series production prediction and economic objectives. This study proposed a novel approach, combining a data-driven model with evolutionary optimization algorithms to optimize fracturing parameters. We established a significant number of static and dynamic data sets representing the geological and developmental characteristics of tight oil reservoirs from numerical simulation. Four production-prediction models based on machine-learning methods—support vector machine, gradient-boosted decision tree, random forest, and multilayer perception—were constructed as mapping functions between static properties and dynamic production. Then, to optimize the fracturing parameters, the best machine-learning-based production predictive model was coupled with four evolutionary algorithms—genetic algorithm, differential evolution algorithm, simulated annealing algorithm, and particle swarm optimization—to investigate the highest net present value (NPV). The results show that among the four production-prediction models established, multilayer perception (MLP) has the best prediction performance. Among the evolutionary algorithms, particle swarm optimization (PSO) not only has the fastest convergence speed but also the highest net present value. The optimal fracturing parameters for the study area were identified. The hybrid MLP-PSO model represents a robust and convenient method to forecast the time-series production and to optimize fracturing parameters by reducing manual tuning.
Suggested Citation
Zhenzhen Dong & Lei Wu & Linjun Wang & Weirong Li & Zhengbo Wang & Zhaoxia Liu, 2022.
"Optimization of Fracturing Parameters with Machine-Learning and Evolutionary Algorithm Methods,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6063-:d:893984
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6063-:d:893984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.