IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i16p6032-d893092.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Confining Pressure and Hydrostatic Pressure on the Fracturing of Rock under Cyclic Electrohydraulic Shock Waves

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Yu

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Hui Zhang

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Ruizhi Yang

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhixiang Cai

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Kerou Liu

    (College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

For an array of applications of the high voltage pulse discharge technology in reservoir stimulations and to gain a deeper understanding of the fractures mechanism of deep well rock under cyclic electrohydraulic shock waves (EHSWs), the effect of confining pressure and hydrostatic pressure on the fracturing of rock under EHSWs are investigated in this paper. Firstly, a two-dimensional (2D) water-explosive numerical model is built to match the computed peak pressure of the EHSW with that obtained by the empirical formula by tuning the relevant parameters, based on the equivalent method of EHSWs. Then, a rock model is established to obtain the stress distribution under static loads. Subsequently, the water-explosive model is coupled with the rock model to obtain the stress distribution under static and dynamic loads. In addition, based on this coupling model, the influences of confining pressure and hydrostatic pressure on circumferential stress, radial stress in the rock and the fracturing of rock around the wellbore are discussed. Finally, two improvement measures (increasing discharge energy and changing loading mode) are proposed to acquire greater fracture density based on intensive numerical simulations. The results show that the increase in hydrostatic pressure is beneficial to the crack formation and development, whereas confining pressure is harmful. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of confining pressure on crack formation is greater than the promotion effect of hydrostatic pressure on crack formation. Increasing the discharge energy can effectively promote the development of the number and length of main cracks. Under four repetitive loading modes with the same total discharge energy (1.36 × 15 kJ), the greatest fracture density can be obtained by using repetitive loading mode with a gradually decreasing mode of discharge energy (first level: 2 times (1.36 × 5 kJ); second level: 5 times (1.36 × 1 kJ)).

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Yu & Hui Zhang & Ruizhi Yang & Zhixiang Cai & Kerou Liu, 2022. "Effects of Confining Pressure and Hydrostatic Pressure on the Fracturing of Rock under Cyclic Electrohydraulic Shock Waves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6032-:d:893092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6032/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/16/6032/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhixiang Cai & Hui Zhang & Kerou Liu & Yufei Chen & Qing Yu, 2020. "Experimental Investigation and Mechanism Analysis on Rock Damage by High Voltage Spark Discharge in Water: Effect of Electrical Conductivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reza Rezaee, 2022. "Editorial on Special Issues of Development of Unconventional Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-9, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:16:p:6032-:d:893092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.