IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i14p5261-d867260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Shale Gas Leaking Incident in Fuling Shale Gas Field in Chongqing, China: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Zhang

    (National Joint Engineering Research Center for Shale Gas Exploration and Development, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China
    Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Haijun Mao

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    Wuhan Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Zhiping Zhang

    (National Joint Engineering Research Center for Shale Gas Exploration and Development, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China
    Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Exploration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chongqing Institute of Geology & Mineral Resources, Chongqing 401120, China)

  • Shu Jiang

    (Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yiming Liu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China)

Abstract

A ground natural gas leaking event at the Fuling shale gas field is reported in this paper. Thirteen leakage spots were discovered in two places near the SW-1 and SW-2 drilling wells. The biggest leak rate was above 1000 m 3 per day, and no H 2 S was identified in any of the 13 leaking spots, according to the field study. The chemical components, carbon isotope properties of the leaking gases, and the geological context of the leaking location were researched in order to determine the reason for the leaking incident. From the geological conditions, the Shimen 1# fault belt cuts the whole strata from bottom to top, according to seismic reverse time migration (RTM), and the fault and leaking spots are located in the range of the surface projection of the horizontal section of the adjacent shale gas well. The fracture development evaluation shows that the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation, which is also the producing layer of the Fuling shale gas field, has a very high possibility of fracture development. From the geochemical view, the carbon isotope of the leaking gases lies in the range of the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation, showing that the Wufeng–Longmaxi Formation is the gas source of the leaking gas.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Zhang & Haijun Mao & Zhiping Zhang & Shu Jiang & Yiming Liu, 2022. "A Shale Gas Leaking Incident in Fuling Shale Gas Field in Chongqing, China: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5261-:d:867260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/14/5261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Howarth & Renee Santoro & Anthony Ingraffea, 2012. "Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(2), pages 537-549, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleanor Stephenson & Karena Shaw, 2013. "¨ A Dilemma of Abundance: Governance Challenges of Reconciling Shale Gas Development and Climate Change Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Ma, Zhengwei & Pi, Guanglin & Dong, Xiucheng & Chen, Chi, 2017. "The situation analysis of shale gas development in China-based on Structural Equation Modeling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1300-1307.
    3. Jacobson, Mark Z. & Howarth, Robert W. & Delucchi, Mark A. & Scobie, Stan R. & Barth, Jannette M. & Dvorak, Michael J. & Klevze, Megan & Katkhuda, Hind & Miranda, Brian & Chowdhury, Navid A. & Jones, , 2013. "Response to comment on paper examining the feasibility of changing New York state's energy infrastructure to one derived from wind, water, and sunlight," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1212-1215.
    4. Bistline, John E., 2015. "Electric sector capacity planning under uncertainty: Climate policy and natural gas in the US," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 236-251.
    5. Philipp M. Richter, 2015. "From Boom to Bust? A Critical Look at US Shale Gas Projections," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    6. Bradley, Tom & Maga, Daniel & Antón, Sara, 2015. "Unified approach to Life Cycle Assessment between three unique algae biofuel facilities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1052-1061.
    7. Bistline, John E., 2014. "Natural gas, uncertainty, and climate policy in the US electric power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 433-442.
    8. Wang, Qiang & Chen, Xi & Jha, Awadhesh N. & Rogers, Howard, 2014. "Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-28.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5261-:d:867260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.