Author
Listed:
- Gregory K. Delipei
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Pascal Rouxelin
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Agustin Abarca
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jason Hou
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Maria Avramova
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Kostadin Ivanov
(Department of Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7909, USA
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
Abstract
Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approaches for nuclear reactor applications have been extensively developed in recent years. The challenge for BEPU approaches is to achieve multi-physics modeling with an acceptable computational cost while preserving a reasonable fidelity of the physics modeled. In this work, we present the core multi-physics computational framework developed for the efficient computation of uncertainties in Light Water Reactor (LWR) simulations. The subchannel thermal-hydraulic code CTF and the nodal expansion neutronic code PARCS are coupled for the multi-physics modeling (CTF-PARCS). The computational framework is discussed in detail from the Polaris lattice calculations up to the CTF-PARCS coupling approaches. Sampler is used to perturb the multi-group microscopic cross-sections, fission yields and manufacturing parameters, while Dakota is used to sample the CTF input parameters and the boundary conditions. Python scripts were developed to automatize and modularize both pre- and post-processing. The current state of the framework allows the consistent perturbation of inputs across neutronics and thermal-hydraulics modeling. Improvements to the standard thermal-hydraulics modeling for such coupling approaches have been implemented in CTF to allow the usage of 3D burnup distribution, calculation of the radial power and the burnup profile, and the usage of Santamarina effective Doppler temperature. The uncertainty quantification approach allows the treatment of both scalar and functional quantities and can estimate correlation between the multi-physics outputs of interest and up to the originally perturbed microscopic cross-sections and yields. The computational framework is applied to three exercises of the LWR Uncertainty Analysis in Modeling Phase III benchmark. The exercises cover steady-state, depletion and transient calculations. The results show that the maximum fuel centerline temperature across all exercises is 2474 K with 1.7 % uncertainty and that the most correlated inputs are the 238 U inelastic and elastic cross-sections above 1 MeV.
Suggested Citation
Gregory K. Delipei & Pascal Rouxelin & Agustin Abarca & Jason Hou & Maria Avramova & Kostadin Ivanov, 2022.
"CTF-PARCS Core Multi-Physics Computational Framework for Efficient LWR Steady-State, Depletion and Transient Uncertainty Quantification,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-39, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5226-:d:866584
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:14:p:5226-:d:866584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.