IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i11p4139-d831763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of the Optimization and Implementation of Adjustment Parameters for Advanced Control Techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Cleber Asmar Ganzaroli

    (Electrical, Mechanical and Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, GO, Brazil
    Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group, Federal Institute of Goias, Senador Canedo 75250-000, GO, Brazil
    Academic Area Department, Goiano Federal Institute, Trindade 75389-269, GO, Brazil)

  • Douglas Freire de Carvalho

    (Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group, Federal Institute of Goias, Senador Canedo 75250-000, GO, Brazil)

  • Antonio Paulo Coimbra

    (Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, 3030-194 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Luiz Alberto do Couto

    (Electrical, Mechanical and Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, GO, Brazil
    Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group, Federal Institute of Goias, Senador Canedo 75250-000, GO, Brazil
    Academic Area Department, Federal Institute of Brasília, Taguatinga 72146-050, DF, Brazil)

  • Wesley Pacheco Calixto

    (Electrical, Mechanical and Computer Engineering School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania 74605-010, GO, Brazil
    Studies and Researches in Science and Technology Group, Federal Institute of Goias, Senador Canedo 75250-000, GO, Brazil
    Institute of Systems and Robotics, University of Coimbra, 3030-194 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

This paper proposes the implementation, analysis and comparison of the control techniques Proportional, Integral and Derivative, Nonlinear Predictive, Fuzzy control and Sliding Mode Control technique applied to the speed control of an independent excited DC motor driven by a three-phase fully controlled rectifier of six pulses. The methodology proposes the design of the bench, modeling of the real system by the system identification method and the adjustments of the parameters of the controllers using an optimization process. Comparisons are made between the techniques, highlighting their characteristics and performances when executed under similar conditions. The robustness of each control, when acting on a nonlinear system, is investigated. All control techniques are applied in three different tests: (i) reference signal of step type without load application, (ii) reference signal with amplitude variation without load application and (iii) reference signal of step type with load application. The smallest value of the integral of the absolute percentage error for the first test is 2.01% with the Fuzzy control, for the second test is 3.34% with the nonlinear predictive control and for the third test it is 1.41% also with the nonlinear predictive control. The techniques present satisfactory performance in the execution of the proposed control, depending, therefore, on the analysis of the system to be implemented to determine the appropriate method.

Suggested Citation

  • Cleber Asmar Ganzaroli & Douglas Freire de Carvalho & Antonio Paulo Coimbra & Luiz Alberto do Couto & Wesley Pacheco Calixto, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of the Optimization and Implementation of Adjustment Parameters for Advanced Control Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:4139-:d:831763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/4139/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/11/4139/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Szymon Ogonowski, 2021. "On-Line Optimization of Energy Consumption in Electromagnetic Mill Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:4139-:d:831763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.