Author
Listed:
- María Martínez
(Escuela de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Avenida Brasil 2085, Valparaíso 2362803, Chile
Centro de Biotecnología de Sistemas, Universidad Andrés Bello (CSB-UNAB), Fernández Concha 700—Las Condes, Santiago 7591538, Chile)
- Alejandra Rodríguez
(Composting Research Group, Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Escola d’Enginyeria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)
- Teresa Gea
(Composting Research Group, Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Escola d’Enginyeria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)
- Xavier Font
(Composting Research Group, Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Escola d’Enginyeria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain)
Abstract
Sophorolipids (SLs) are microbial biosurfactants with an important role in industry and a continuously growing market. This research addresses the use of sustainable resources as feedstock for bioproducts. Winterization oil cake (WOC) and molasses are suitable substrates for SLs via solid-state fermentation (SSF). The model proposed herein was established for annually processing 750 t of WOC and comparing three support materials: wheat straw (WS), rice husk (RH), and coconut fiber (CF). Production capacity ranged 325–414 t of SLs per year. Unit Production Cost was 5.1, 5.7, and 6.9 USD/kg SL for WS, RH, and CF production models, respectively, and was slightly lower with other substrates. Financial parameters were CAPEX 6.7 MM USD and OPEX 1.9 MM USD/y, with a NPV, IRR and payback time of 6.4 MM USD, 31% and 3.2 y, respectively. SLs recovery from the solid matrix was the major contributor to operating costs, while fermentation equipment shaped capital costs. Results show that the physical properties (bulk density, WHC) of substrates and supports define process costs beyond substrate purchase costs and process yields in SSF systems. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to model SLs production via SSF at full scale for the economic valuation of the SSF process.
Suggested Citation
María Martínez & Alejandra Rodríguez & Teresa Gea & Xavier Font, 2022.
"A Simplified Techno-Economic Analysis for Sophorolipid Production in a Solid-State Fermentation Process,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:4077-:d:829870
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Pan, Shiyou & Guo, Fan & Li, Xiangyi & Feng, Linchuan & Li, Zhenchong & Du, Liqin & Wei, Yutuo, 2024.
"Briquetting as a source pretreatment strategy to improve energy recovery from the anaerobic digestion of agricultural straw: Experimental and economic evaluation,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:11:p:4077-:d:829870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.