IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3843-d822211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits Achieved by Energy Suppliers through Cooperation with Individual Recipients and Their Readiness for This Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Izabela Baruk

    (Faculty of Organization and Management, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland)

  • Mateusz Grzesiak

    (WSB Academy, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to identify the benefits perceived by individual recipients that are achieved by consumer energy suppliers on the market, through multilateral trade cooperation, and to define the structure of these benefits according to the declared readiness of recipients to cooperate with the suppliers. The results of the analysis of the available literature on the subject indicate that there is a cognitive and research gap in relation to the perceived benefits achieved by the suppliers through joint marketing activities. The benefits are not being analyzed; especially from the perspective of individual recipients’ readiness for this cooperation. This gap is noticeable not only in relation to the energy market, but also in other areas of the consumer market. In an effort to reduce the identified gap, an online survey was conducted among 1196 adult individual energy recipients in Poland. The primary data collected was subjected to quantitative analysis using the following research methods: average grade analysis, comparative analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. The Kruskal–Wallis test was also conducted. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate, inter alia, that the majority of the respondents declared their readiness to cooperate with energy suppliers on the preparation of marketing offers. This variable statistically significantly differentiated nine out of twelve analyzed benefits that, according to the respondents, suppliers obtain as a result of cooperation. This differentiation was not found only in the case of three benefits related to the cost-free acquisition of recipient potential. For all respondents, as well as for the respondents willing to cooperate with suppliers and for those who did not express such willingness, three sections were identified, including the respondents who saw the same benefits achieved by suppliers. The conclusions drawn on the basis of the analysis results constitute a significant contribution to the theory of marketing and the theory of market behavior of individual recipients in the energy market. They also bear clear application advantages, making it easier for energy suppliers to effectively initiate cooperation with individual recipients and/or strengthen this cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Mateusz Grzesiak, 2022. "Benefits Achieved by Energy Suppliers through Cooperation with Individual Recipients and Their Readiness for This Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3843-:d:822211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3843/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3843/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Prosumers’ Needs Satisfied Due to Cooperation with Offerors in the Context of Attitudes toward Such Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Gabriela Menet & Marek Szarucki, 2020. "Impact of Value Co-Creation on International Customer Satisfaction in the Airsoft Industry: Does Country of Origin Matter?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Gurjeet Kaur Sahi & Sanjeewani Sehgal & Rita Sharma, 2017. "Predicting Customers Recommendation from Co-creation of Value, Customization and Relational Value," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 42(1), pages 19-35, March.
    4. Siripha Junlakarn & Phimsupha Kokchang & Kulyos Audomvongseree, 2022. "Drivers and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading Development in Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Lucas Roth & Jens Lowitzsch & Özgür Yildiz, 2021. "An Empirical Study of How Household Energy Consumption Is Affected by Co-Owning Different Technological Means to Produce Renewable Energy and the Production Purpose," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-38, July.
    6. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    7. Daniel Wuebben & Jens F. Peters, 2022. "Communicating the Values and Benefits of Home Solar Prosumerism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Saulė Milčiuvienė & Julija Kiršienė & Enrique Doheijo & Rolandas Urbonas & Darius Milčius, 2019. "The Role of Renewable Energy Prosumers in Implementing Energy Justice Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Baležentis & Artiom Volkov & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Agnė Žičkienė & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Barriers and Drivers of Renewable Energy Penetration in Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Yi, Youjae & Gong, Taeshik, 2013. "Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1279-1284.
    11. Sławomir Bielecki & Tadeusz Skoczkowski & Lidia Sobczak & Janusz Buchoski & Łukasz Maciąg & Piotr Dukat, 2021. "Impact of the Lockdown during the COVID-19 Pandemic on Electricity Use by Residential Users," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2023. "A Few Words of Introduction to a Holistic Approach to the Energy Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-3, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Prosumers’ Needs Satisfied Due to Cooperation with Offerors in the Context of Attitudes toward Such Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Liguo Lou & Lin Li & Sung-Byung Yang & Joon Koh, 2021. "Promoting User Participation of Shared Mobility in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from Chinese Bike Sharing Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Tueanrat, Yanika & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2021. "A conceptual framework of the antecedents of customer journey satisfaction in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Truong Thi Xuan Dao & Pham Huong Trang & Tran Duc Thanh, 2022. "The Big Five personality traits and co-production behaviour of Vietnamese tourists: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 40(1), pages 97-127.
    5. Hsiao, Chan & Lee, Yi-Hsuan & Chen, Wan-Jun, 2015. "The effect of servant leadership on customer value co-creation: A cross-level analysis of key mediating roles," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Jaciow & Radosław Wolniak & Robert Wolny & Wieslaw Wes Grebski, 2023. "Assessment of Energy and Heat Consumption Trends and Forecasting in the Small Consumer Sector in Poland Based on Historical Data," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-33, September.
    7. Foroudi, Pantea & Yu, Qionglei & Gupta, Suraksha & Foroudi, Mohammad M., 2019. "Enhancing university brand image and reputation through customer value co-creation behaviour," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 218-227.
    8. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    9. Navarro, Susana & Llinares, Carmen & Garzon, Dolores, 2016. "Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1336-1339.
    10. Baoliang Hu & Wei Huang & Shuai Yan & Guang Liu & Tao Zhang, 2020. "Business Model Design and Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Role of Customer Citizenship Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Małgorzata Wiścicka-Fernando & Sandra Misiak-Kwit & Kelaniyage Shihan Dilruk Fernando, 2019. "Co-Creation as an Innovative Way to Develop an Enterprise—Cross-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    12. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk, 2021. "Relationships between Final Purchasers and Offerors in the Context of Their Perception by Final Purchasers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Grzegorz Tchorek & Michał Brzozowski & Katarzyna Dziewanowska & Agnieszka Allen & Waldemar Kozioł & Michał Kurtyka & Filip Targowski, 2020. "Social Capital and Value Co-Creation: The Case of a Polish Car Sharing Company," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Lionel Nicod & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "How should customers be trained in their role as coproducers? The influence of training and its characteristics on the benefits of coproduction," Post-Print hal-03513344, HAL.
    16. José-Ramón Segarra-Moliner & Miguel-Ángel Moliner-Tena, 2024. "Engaging in customer citizenship behaviours to predict customer lifetime value," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 307-320, June.
    17. Marcus Adam, 2018. "The Role of Human Resource Management (HRM) for the Implementation of Sustainable Product-Service Systems (PSS)—An Analysis of Fashion Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Shi, Lei & Miles, Angela, 2020. "Non-effectual, non-customer effectual, or customer-effectual: A conceptual exploration of the applicability of the effectuation logic in startup brand identity construction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 168-179.
    19. Rather, Raouf Ahmad & Raisinghani, Manju & Gligor, David & Parrey, Shakir Hussain & Russo, Ivan & Bozkurt, Sıddık, 2023. "Examining tourist citizenship behaviors through affective, cognitive, behavioral engagement and reputation: Symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Cassandra France & Debra Grace & Joseph Lo Iacono & Joan Carlini, 0. "Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3843-:d:822211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.