IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i10p3593-d815418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation Modeling for Energy-Flexible Manufacturing: Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Author

Listed:
  • Jana Köberlein

    (Fraunhofer IGCV, Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV, Am Technologiezentrum 10, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Lukas Bank

    (Fraunhofer IGCV, Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV, Am Technologiezentrum 10, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Stefan Roth

    (Fraunhofer IGCV, Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV, Am Technologiezentrum 10, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Ekrem Köse

    (Fraunhofer IPA, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70567 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Timm Kuhlmann

    (Fraunhofer IPA, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70567 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Bastian Prell

    (Fraunhofer IWU, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Reichenhainer Straße 88, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Maximilian Stange

    (Fraunhofer IWU, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Reichenhainer Straße 88, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Marc Münnich

    (Fraunhofer IWU, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Reichenhainer Straße 88, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Dominik Flum

    (PTW TU Darmstadt, Institute of Production Management, Technology and Machine Tools, Technical University of Darmstadt, Otto-Berndt-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Daniel Moog

    (PTW TU Darmstadt, Institute of Production Management, Technology and Machine Tools, Technical University of Darmstadt, Otto-Berndt-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Steffen Ihlenfeldt

    (Fraunhofer IWU, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology IWU, Reichenhainer Straße 88, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Alexander Sauer

    (Fraunhofer IPA, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production EEP, University of Stuttgart, Nobelstr. 12, 70567 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Matthias Weigold

    (PTW TU Darmstadt, Institute of Production Management, Technology and Machine Tools, Technical University of Darmstadt, Otto-Berndt-Straße 2, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Johannes Schilp

    (Fraunhofer IGCV, Fraunhofer Institute for Casting, Composite and Processing Technology IGCV, Am Technologiezentrum 10, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

Abstract

Due to the high share of industry in total electricity consumption, industrial demand-side management can make a relevant contribution to the stability of power systems. At the same time, companies get the opportunity to reduce their electricity procurement costs by taking advantage of increasingly fluctuating prices on short-term electricity markets, the provision of system services on balancing power markets, or by increasing the share of their own consumption from on-site generated renewable energy. Demand-side management requires the ability to react flexibly to the power supply situation without negatively affecting production targets. It also means that the management and operation of production must consider not only production-related parameters but also parameters of energy availability, which further increase the complexity of decision-making. Although simulation studies are a recognized tool for supporting decision-making processes in production and logistics, the simultaneous simulation of material and energy flows has so far been limited mainly to issues of energy efficiency as opposed to energy flexibility, where application-oriented experience is still limited. We assume that the consideration of energy flexibility in the simulation of manufacturing systems will amplify already known pitfalls in conducting simulation studies. Based on five representative industrial use cases, this article provides practitioners with application-oriented experiences of the coupling of energy and material flows in simulation modeling of energy-flexible manufacturing, identifies challenges in the simulation of energy-flexible production systems, and proposes approaches to face these challenges. Seven pitfalls that pose a particular challenge in simulating energy-flexible manufacturing have been identified, and possible solutions and measures for avoiding them are shown. It has been found that, among other things, consistent management of all parties involved, early clarification of energy-related, logistical, and resulting technical requirements for models and software, as well as the application of suitable methods for validation and verification are central to avoiding these pitfalls. The identification and characterization of challenges and the derivation of recommendations for coping with them can raise awareness of typical pitfalls. This paper thus helps to ensure that simulation studies of energy-flexible production systems can be carried out more efficiently in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jana Köberlein & Lukas Bank & Stefan Roth & Ekrem Köse & Timm Kuhlmann & Bastian Prell & Maximilian Stange & Marc Münnich & Dominik Flum & Daniel Moog & Steffen Ihlenfeldt & Alexander Sauer & Matthias, 2022. "Simulation Modeling for Energy-Flexible Manufacturing: Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3593-:d:815418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/10/3593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Barth & Matthias Meyer & Jan Spitzner, 2012. "Typical Pitfalls of Simulation Modeling - Lessons Learned from Armed Forces and Business," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 15(2), pages 1-5.
    2. Buhl, Hans Ulrich & Fridgen, Gilbert & Körner, Marc-Fabian & Michaelis, Anne & Rägo, Vadim & Schöpf, Michael & Schott, Paul & Sitzmann, Amelie, 2019. "Ausgangsbedingungen für die Vermarktung von Nachfrageflexibilität: Status-Quo-Analyse und Metastudie. 2. Fassung," Bayreuth Reports on Information Systems Management 66, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Information Systems Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. António Gomes Martins & Luís Pires Neves & José Luís Sousa, 2023. "Electricity Demand Side Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-3, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorscheid, Iris & Meyer, Matthias, 2016. "Divide and conquer: Configuring submodels for valid and efficient analyses of complex simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 326(C), pages 152-161.
    2. Sina Hocke & Matthias Meyer & Iris Lorscheid, 2015. "Improving simulation model analysis and communication via design of experiment principles: an example from the simulation-based design of cost accounting systems," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 131-155, August.
    3. Cathérine Grisar & Matthias Meyer, 2015. "Use of Monte Carlo simulation: an empirical study of German, Austrian and Swiss controlling departments," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 249-273, August.
    4. Cathérine Grisar & Matthias Meyer, 2016. "Use of simulation in controlling research: a systematic literature review for German-speaking countries," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 117-157, April.
    5. Marijanovic, Zorica & Theile, Philipp & Czock, Berit Hanna, 2022. "Value of short-term heating system flexibility – A case study for residential heat pumps on the German intraday market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    6. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    7. Stephan Leitner & Friederike Wall, 2015. "Simulation-based research in management accounting and control: an illustrative overview," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 105-129, August.
    8. Julia Schulz & Daniel Leinmüller & Adam Misik & Michael F. Zaeh, 2021. "Renewable On-Site Power Generation for Manufacturing Companies—Technologies, Modeling, and Dimensioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:10:p:3593-:d:815418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.