IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i8p2037-d531486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of a Rotating Detonation Rocket Engine with Various Convergent Nozzles and Chamber Lengths

Author

Listed:
  • John W. Bennewitz

    (Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards, CA 93524, USA)

  • Blaine R. Bigler

    (Jacobs Technology Group, Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards, CA 93524, USA)

  • Mathias C. Ross

    (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Stephen A. Danczyk

    (Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards, CA 93524, USA)

  • William A. Hargus

    (Air Force Research Laboratory, Edwards, CA 93524, USA)

  • Richard D. Smith

    (GHKN Engineering LLC., Kirkland, WA 98034, USA)

Abstract

A rotating detonation rocket engine (RDRE) with various convergent nozzles and chamber lengths is investigated. Three hundred hot-fire tests are performed using methane and oxygen ranging from equivalence ratio equaling 0.5–2.5 and total propellant flow up to 0.680 kg/s. For the full-length (76.2 mm) chamber study, three nozzles at contraction ratios ϵ c = 1.23, 1.62 and 2.40 are tested. Detonation is exhibited for each geometry at equivalent conditions, with only fuel-rich operability slightly increased for the ϵ c = 1.62 and 2.40 nozzles. Despite this, counter-propagation, i.e., opposing wave sets, becomes prevalent with increasing constriction. This is accompanied by higher number of waves, lower wave speed U wv and higher unsteadiness. Therefore, the most constricted nozzle always has the lowest U wv . In contrast, engine performance increases with constriction, where thrust and specific impulse linearly increase with ϵ c for equivalent conditions, with a 27% maximum increase. Additionally, two half-length (38.1 mm) chambers are studied including a straight chamber and ϵ c = 2.40 nozzle; these shortened geometries show equal performance to their longer equivalent. Furthermore, the existence of counter-propagation is minimized. Accompanying high-fidelity simulations and injection recovery analyses describe underlying injection physics driving chamber wave dynamics, suggesting the physical throat/injector interaction influences counter-propagation.

Suggested Citation

  • John W. Bennewitz & Blaine R. Bigler & Mathias C. Ross & Stephen A. Danczyk & William A. Hargus & Richard D. Smith, 2021. "Performance of a Rotating Detonation Rocket Engine with Various Convergent Nozzles and Chamber Lengths," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2037-:d:531486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/8/2037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanliang Chen & Xiangyang Liu & Jianping Wang, 2021. "Effects of Reversed Shock Waves on Operation Mode in H 2 /O 2 Rotating Detonation Chambers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Assad, Mohamad & Penyzkov, Oleq & Chernukho, Ivan, 2022. "Symbiosis of deflagration and detonation in one jet system – A hybrid detonation engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:8:p:2037-:d:531486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.