IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i6p1704-d519949.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Risk of Lightning Losses in a Structure Equipped with RTC Devices According to the Standard EN 62305-2.2008

Author

Listed:
  • Zofia Wróbel

    (PKP Polish Railway Lines JSC, Railway Lines Establishment in Rzeszów, St. Batorego 26 Str., 35-005 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Adam St. Jagiełło

    (Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Str., 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Incorrect adjustment of railway traffic control devices (rtc) to the specificity of the area in terms of lightning density may result in their damage by lightning-caused electromagnetic pulses. An associated risk assessment, as the standard in the analyses of the strength of rtc devices, should be made. However, manufacturers of rtc devices typically do not perform tests with respect to such high overvoltage conditions. Particularly in the case of the EN 62305-2 standard, the manufacturers of new rail traffic control devices usually do not carry out such analyses. In this paper, an analysis of the damage vulnerability of rtc devices caused by lightning discharges for a selected structure, including a signal box equipped with digital rtc devices is presented. The necessity of conducting a lightning damage vulnerability analysis for rtc devices is demonstrated. A part of the railway track where lightning discharges occur was analyzed. The results of the risk analysis obtained with the use of the DEHN Risk Tool software and based on the standard EN 62305-2 (2008, Lightning protection. Part 2. Risk management) are presented. Due to the fact that railway devices are not included in the current standard, three documents were adopted for the analysis: two editions of EN/IEC 62305-2 (from 2008 and 2012) and the recommendations of the ITU-International Telecommunication Union ITU-T K.39 (10/1996). The presented analysis is performed according to the 2008 standard version and to the chosen device.

Suggested Citation

  • Zofia Wróbel & Adam St. Jagiełło, 2021. "The Risk of Lightning Losses in a Structure Equipped with RTC Devices According to the Standard EN 62305-2.2008," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1704-:d:519949
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1704/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1704/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Dudzik, 2020. "Towards Characterization of Indoor Environment in Smart Buildings: Modelling PMV Index Using Neural Network with One Hidden Layer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-37, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabhakar Krishnan & A V Prabu & Sumathi Loganathan & Sidheswar Routray & Uttam Ghosh & Mohammed AL-Numay, 2023. "Analyzing and Managing Various Energy-Related Environmental Factors for Providing Personalized IoT Services for Smart Buildings in Smart Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Przemysław Markiewicz-Zahorski & Joanna Rucińska & Małgorzata Fedorczak-Cisak & Michał Zielina, 2021. "Building Energy Performance Analysis after Changing Its Form of Use from an Office to a Residential Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Dmitry Kaplun & Alexander Krasichkov & Petr Chetyrbok & Nikolay Oleinikov & Anupam Garg & Husanbir Singh Pannu, 2021. "Cancer Cell Profiling Using Image Moments and Neural Networks with Model Agnostic Explainability: A Case Study of Breast Cancer Histopathological (BreakHis) Database," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1704-:d:519949. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.