IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i5p1338-d508393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspective Design of Algae Photobioreactor for Greenhouses—A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kateřina Sukačová

    (Global Change Research Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Pavel Lošák

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Brummer

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Vítězslav Máša

    (Institute of Process Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Daniel Vícha

    (Global Change Research Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Tomáš Zavřel

    (Global Change Research Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Bělidla 986/4a, 603 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The continued growth and evolving lifestyles of the human population require the urgent development of sustainable production in all its aspects. Microalgae have the potential of the sustainable production of various commodities; however, the energetic requirements of algae cultivation still largely contribute to the overall negative balance of many operation plants. Here, we evaluate energetic efficiency of biomass and lipids production by Chlorella pyrenoidosa in multi-tubular, helical-tubular, and flat-panel airlift pilot scale photobioreactors, placed in an indoor environment of greenhouse laboratory in Central Europe. Our results show that the main energy consumption was related to the maintenance of constant light intensity in the flat-panel photobioreactor and the culture circulation in the helical-tubular photobioreactor. The specific power input ranged between 0.79 W L −1 in the multi-tubular photobioreactor and 6.8 W L −1 in the flat-panel photobioreactor. The construction of multi-tubular photobioreactor allowed for the lowest energy requirements but also predetermined the highest temperature sensitivity and led to a significant reduction of Chlorella productivity in extraordinary warm summers 2018 and 2019. To meet the requirements of sustainable yearlong microalgal production in the context of global change, further development towards hybrid microalgal cultivation systems, combining the advantages of open and closed systems, can be expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Kateřina Sukačová & Pavel Lošák & Vladimír Brummer & Vítězslav Máša & Daniel Vícha & Tomáš Zavřel, 2021. "Perspective Design of Algae Photobioreactor for Greenhouses—A Comparative Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1338-:d:508393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/5/1338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brennan, Liam & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Biofuels from microalgae--A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 557-577, February.
    2. Sajjadi, Baharak & Chen, Wei-Yin & Raman, Abdul. Aziz. Abdul & Ibrahim, Shaliza, 2018. "Microalgae lipid and biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review on lipid enhancement strategies and their effects on fatty acid composition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 200-232.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José C. M. Pires & Ana L. Gonçalves, 2022. "Microalgae Cultures: Environmental Tool and Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-4, August.
    2. Grira, Soumaya & Abu Khalifeh, Hadil & Alkhedher, Mohammad & Ramadan, Mohamad, 2023. "The conventional microalgal biofuel production process and the alternative milking pathway: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Beata Brzychczyk & Jan Giełżecki & Krzysztof Kijanowski & Tomasz Hebda & Filip Rzepka, 2023. "Automation of the Photobioreactor Lighting System to Manage Light Distribution in Microalgae Cultures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    2. Amarnath Krishnamoorthy & Cristina Rodriguez & Andy Durrant, 2022. "Sustainable Approaches to Microalgal Pre-Treatment Techniques for Biodiesel Production: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Banerjee, Sanjukta & Banerjee, Srijoni & Ghosh, Ananta K. & Das, Debabrata, 2020. "Maneuvering the genetic and metabolic pathway for improving biofuel production in algae: Present status and future prospective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Abdullah, Bawadi & Syed Muhammad, Syed Anuar Faua’ad & Shokravi, Zahra & Ismail, Shahrul & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Mahmood, Azmi Nik & Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman A., 2019. "Fourth generation biofuel: A review on risks and mitigation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 37-50.
    5. Zahra Shokravi & Hoofar Shokravi & Ong Hwai Chyuan & Woei Jye Lau & Seyed Saeid Rahimian Koloor & Michal Petrů & Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, 2020. "Improving ‘Lipid Productivity’ in Microalgae by Bilateral Enhancement of Biomass and Lipid Contents: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-28, October.
    6. Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman A. & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Shokravi, Zahra & Jakarni, Fauzan Mohd & Liu, Hong Yuan & Zaini, Nabilah & Tan, Lian See & Islam, A.B.M. Saiful & Shokravi, Hoofar, 2020. "Two-stage cultivation strategy for simultaneous increases in growth rate and lipid content of microalgae: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Behnam Tabatabai & Afua Adusei & Alok Kumar Shrivastava & Prashant Kumar Singh & Viji Sitther, 2020. "Nitrogen Deprivation in Fremyella diplosiphon Augments Lipid Production without Affecting Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Kalpesh K. Sharma & Holger Schuhmann & Peer M. Schenk, 2012. "High Lipid Induction in Microalgae for Biodiesel Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Baral, Nabin & Rabotyagov, Sergey, 2017. "How much are wood-based cellulosic biofuels worth in the Pacific Northwest? Ex-ante and ex-post analysis of local people's willingness to pay," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 99-106.
    10. Atadashi, I.M. & Aroua, M.K. & Abdul Aziz, A.R. & Sulaiman, N.M.N., 2011. "Membrane biodiesel production and refining technology: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 5051-5062.
    11. Al-Jabri, Hareb & Das, Probir & Khan, Shoyeb & AbdulQuadir, Mohammad & Thaher, Mehmoud Ibrahim & Hoekman, Kent & Hawari, Alaa H., 2022. "A comparison of bio-crude oil production from five marine microalgae – Using life cycle analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Duan, Pei-Gao & Yang, Shi-Kun & Xu, Yu-Ping & Wang, Feng & Zhao, Dan & Weng, Yu-Jing & Shi, Xian-Lei, 2018. "Integration of hydrothermal liquefaction and supercritical water gasification for improvement of energy recovery from algal biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 734-745.
    13. Feng, Huan & Zhang, Bo & He, Zhixia & Wang, Shuang & Salih, Osman & Wang, Qian, 2018. "Study on co-liquefaction of Spirulina and Spartina alterniflora in ethanol-water co-solvent for bio-oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1093-1101.
    14. Ribeiro, Lauro André & Silva, Patrícia Pereira da, 2013. "Surveying techno-economic indicators of microalgae biofuel technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 89-96.
    15. Yuan, Hao & Zhang, Xinru & Jiang, Zeyi & Wang, Xinyu & Wang, Yi & Cao, Limei & Zhang, Xinxin, 2020. "Effect of light spectra on microalgal biofilm: Cell growth, photosynthetic property, and main organic composition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 83-89.
    16. Maity, Jyoti Prakash & Hou, Chia-Peng & Majumder, Dip & Bundschuh, Jochen & Kulp, Thomas R. & Chen, Chien-Yen & Chuang, Lu-Te & Nathan Chen, Ching-Nen & Jean, Jiin-Shuh & Yang, Tsui-Chu & Chen, Chien-, 2014. "The production of biofuel and bioelectricity associated with wastewater treatment by green algae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 94-103.
    17. Bergthorson, Jeffrey M. & Thomson, Murray J., 2015. "A review of the combustion and emissions properties of advanced transportation biofuels and their impact on existing and future engines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1393-1417.
    18. Kumar, Ravi Ranjan & Sarkar, Debasis & Sen, Ramkrishna, 2024. "Simultaneously maximizing microalgal biomass and lipid productivities by machine learning driven modeling, global sensitivity analysis and multi-objective optimization for sustainable biodiesel produc," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    19. Dębowski, Marcin & Zieliński, Marcin & Grala, Anna & Dudek, Magda, 2013. "Algae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production technologies—Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 596-604.
    20. Xing, Hui & Spence, Stephen & Chen, Hua, 2020. "A comprehensive review on countermeasures for CO2 emissions from ships," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:5:p:1338-:d:508393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.