Author
Listed:
- Tinuola Udoh
(Department of Chemical/Petrochemical Engineering, Akwa Ibom State University, Ikot Akpaden 520001, Nigeria)
- Jan Vinogradov
(School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3UE, UK)
Abstract
In this paper, a thorough experimental investigation of enhanced oil recovery via controlled salinity-biosurfactant injection under typical reservoir temperature conditions is reported for the first time. Sixteen core flooding experiments were carried out with four displacing fluids in carbonate rock samples and the improved oil recovery was investigated in secondary, tertiary and quaternary injection modes. The temperature effect on oil recovery during floodings was compared at two temperatures (23 °C and 70 °C) on similar rock samples and fluids using two types of biosurfactants: GreenZyme ® and rhamnolipids. The results of this study show that injection of controlled salinity brine (CSB) and controlled salinity biosurfactant brine (CSBSB) improve oil recovery relative to injection of high salinity formation brine (FMB) at both high and low temperatures. At 23 °C, CSBSB improved oil recovery by 15–17% OIIP compared with conventional FMB injection, and by 4–8% OIIP compared with CSB injection. At 70 °C, the injection of CSBSB increased oil recovery by 10–13% OIIP compared with injection of FMB, and by 2–6% OIIP compared with CSB injection. Furthermore, increase in the system temperature generally resulted in increased oil recovery, irrespective of the type of the injection brine. The results of this study have demonstrated for the first time the enhanced oil recovery potential of combined controlled salinity brine and biosurfactant applications at temperature relevant to hydrocarbon reservoirs. The results of this study are significant for the design of controlled salinity and biosurfactant flooding in carbonate reservoirs.
Suggested Citation
Tinuola Udoh & Jan Vinogradov, 2021.
"Controlled Salinity-Biosurfactant Enhanced Oil Recovery at Ambient and Reservoir Temperatures—An Experimental Study,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1077-:d:501519
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:1077-:d:501519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.