IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7517-d676425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Beril Alpagut

    (Demir Energy, Smart and Sustainable Cities Department, Istanbul 34718, Turkey)

  • Arantza Lopez Romo

    (Tecnalia, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Patxi Hernández

    (Tecnalia, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160 Derio, Spain)

  • Oya Tabanoğlu

    (Demir Energy, Smart and Sustainable Cities Department, Istanbul 34718, Turkey)

  • Nekane Hermoso Martinez

    (Tecnalia, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 48160 Derio, Spain)

Abstract

Discussions regarding the definition of Positive Energy Districts and the concept of a boundary are still being actively held. Even though there are certain initiatives working on the boundary limitations for PEDs, there is no methodology or tool developed for selecting peculiar spaces for future PED implementations. The paper focuses on a flexible GIS-based Multicriteria assessment method that identifies the most suitable areas to reach an annual positive non-renewable energy balance. For that purpose, a GIS-based tool is developed to indicate the boundary from an energy perspective harmonized with urban design and land-use planning. The method emphasizes evaluation through economic, social, political, legal, environmental, and technical criteria, and the results present the suitability of areas at macro and micro scales. The current study outlines macro-scale analyses in six European cities that represent Follower Cities under the MAKING-CITY H2020 project. Further research will be conducted for micro-scale analyses and the outcomes will pursue a technology selection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Beril Alpagut & Arantza Lopez Romo & Patxi Hernández & Oya Tabanoğlu & Nekane Hermoso Martinez, 2021. "A GIS-Based Multicriteria Assessment for Identification of Positive Energy Districts Boundary in Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7517-:d:676425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacopo Gaspari & Michaela De Giglio & Ernesto Antonini & Vincenzo Vodola, 2020. "A GIS-Based Methodology for Speedy Energy Efficiency Mapping: A Case Study in Bologna," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Höhn, J. & Lehtonen, E. & Rasi, S. & Rintala, J., 2014. "A Geographical Information System (GIS) based methodology for determination of potential biomasses and sites for biogas plants in southern Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-10.
    3. Andrea Gabaldón Moreno & Fredy Vélez & Beril Alpagut & Patxi Hernández & Cecilia Sanz Montalvillo, 2021. "How to Achieve Positive Energy Districts for Sustainable Cities: A Proposed Calculation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Hainoun & Hans-Martin Neumann & Naomi Morishita-Steffen & Baptiste Mougeot & Étienne Vignali & Florian Mandel & Felix Hörmann & Sebastian Stortecky & Katharina Walter & Martin Kaltenhauser-Barth &, 2022. "Smarter Together: Monitoring and Evaluation of Integrated Building Solutions for Low-Energy Districts of Lighthouse Cities Lyon, Munich, and Vienna," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Axel Bruck & Luca Casamassima & Ardak Akhatova & Lukas Kranzl & Kostas Galanakis, 2022. "Creating Comparability among European Neighbourhoods to Enable the Transition of District Energy Infrastructures towards Positive Energy Districts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Paola Clerici Maestosi, 2022. "Smart Cities and Positive Energy Districts: Urban Perspectives in 2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-5, March.
    4. Sassenou, L.-N. & Olivieri, L. & Olivieri, F., 2024. "Challenges for positive energy districts deployment: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabina Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, 2022. "The Scandinavian Third Way as a Proposal for Sustainable Smart City Development—A Case Study of Aarhus City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. O’Shea, Richard & Kilgallon, Ian & Wall, David & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "Quantification and location of a renewable gas industry based on digestion of wastes in Ireland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 229-239.
    3. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Anastasovski, Aleksandar, 2023. "What is needed for transformation of industrial parks into potential positive energy industrial parks? A review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Chen, Yan & Huang, Zhenhua & Ai, Hongshan & Guo, Xingkun & Luo, Fan, 2021. "The Impact of GIS/GPS Network Information Systems on the Logistics Distribution Cost of Tobacco Enterprises," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Silvia Soutullo & Emanuela Giancola & María Nuria Sánchez & José Antonio Ferrer & David García & María José Súarez & Jesús Ignacio Prieto & Elena Antuña-Yudego & Juan Luís Carús & Miguel Ángel Fernánd, 2020. "Methodology for Quantifying the Energy Saving Potentials Combining Building Retrofitting, Solar Thermal Energy and Geothermal Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    7. Costa, Fabrício Rodrigues & Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares & Marcatti, Gustavo Eduardo & Lorenzon, Alexandre Simões & Teixeira, Thaisa Ribeiro & Domingues, Getulio Fonseca & Castro, Nero Lemos, 2020. "GIS applied to location of bioenergy plants in tropical agricultural areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 911-918.
    8. Paolo Civiero & Jordi Pascual & Joaquim Arcas Abella & Jaume Salom, 2022. "Innovative PEDRERA Model Tool Boosting Sustainable and Feasible Renovation Programs at District Scale in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Mikkel Bojesen & Luc Boerboom & Hans Skov-Petersen, 2014. "Towards a sustainable capacity expansion of the Danish biogas sector," IFRO Working Paper 2014/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    10. Zareei, Samira, 2018. "Evaluation of biogas potential from livestock manures and rural wastes using GIS in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 351-356.
    11. Bruck, Axel & Díaz Ruano, Santiago & Auer, Hans, 2022. "One piece of the puzzle towards 100 Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) across Europe by 2025: An open-source approach to unveil favourable locations of PV-based PEDs from a techno-economic perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    12. Yang, Jin & Chen, Bin, 2014. "Emergy analysis of a biogas-linked agricultural system in rural China – A case study in Gongcheng Yao Autonomous County," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 173-182.
    13. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    14. Vukasinovic, Vladimir & Gordic, Dusan & Zivkovic, Marija & Koncalovic, Davor & Zivkovic, Dubravka, 2019. "Long-term planning methodology for improving wood biomass utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 818-829.
    15. Chukwuma, Emmanuel Chibundo & Okey-Onyesolu, Faith Chinenye & Ani, Kingsley Amaechi & Nwanna, Emmanuel Chukwudi, 2021. "GIS bio-waste assessment and suitability analysis for biogas power plant: A case study of Anambra state of Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1182-1194.
    16. Siegrist, Armin & Bowman, Gillianne & Burg, Vanessa, 2022. "Energy generation potentials from agricultural residues: The influence of techno-spatial restrictions on biomethane, electricity, and heat production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    17. Anna Maria Kowalczyk & Szymon Czyża, 2022. "Optimising Photovoltaic Farm Location Using a Capabilities Matrix and GIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    18. Costa, Isabella & Rochedo, Pedro & Costa, Daniele & Ferreira, Paula & Araújo, Madalena & Schaeffer, Roberto & Szklo, Alexandre, 2019. "Placing hubs in CO2 pipelines: An application to industrial CO2 emissions in the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 22-31.
    19. Xiang Zhao & Xiaoya Ma & Kun Wang & Yuqing Long & Dongjie Zhang & Zhanchun Xiao, 2017. "A Spatially Explicit Optimization Model for Agricultural Straw-Based Power Plant Site Selection: A Case Study in Hubei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Franco, Camilo & Bojesen, Mikkel & Hougaard, Jens Leth & Nielsen, Kurt, 2015. "A fuzzy approach to a multiple criteria and Geographical Information System for decision support on suitable locations for biogas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 304-315.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7517-:d:676425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.