IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i22p7488-d675502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Development of the European Union in the Relation of Sustainable Development—Taxonomic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas

    (Faculty of Economic and Management, University of Zielona Góra, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Anetta Barska

    (Faculty of Economic and Management, University of Zielona Góra, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland)

  • Joanna Wyrwa

    (Faculty of Economic and Management, University of Zielona Góra, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is a multidimensional assessment of the diversification of economic development in EU countries in the context of the progress in the implementation of the concept of sustainable development in 2014 and 2019. The issues discussed in this article are topical and important, given that the spatial disparity of economic development in the EU has never been so pronounced as it is today. While there is a wealth of studies on economic development in the literature, research on the comprehensive approach to this problem in the relation of sustainable development appears to be rather scarce. The article emphasizes the role of energy in economic growth. Authors used taxonomic measures. They were constructed on the basis of selected methods of multidimensional comparative analysis. By using the Hellwig method and the TOPSIS method, taxonomic measures were constructed, and linear ordering of the EU countries was carried out. In addition, using the so-called threshold method, the clustering of EU countries was carried out. The analysis involved 27 EU countries. The conducted research revealed significant disproportions between the respective EU countries in terms of the level of economic development in the relation of implementing the concept of sustainable development. It seems justified to take action aimed at eliminating the differences between the countries in the analyzed aspect. It is necessary both to intensify efforts at the level of individual Member States and the EU, oriented towards pro-development activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Janina Jędrzejczak-Gas & Anetta Barska & Joanna Wyrwa, 2021. "Economic Development of the European Union in the Relation of Sustainable Development—Taxonomic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7488-:d:675502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/22/7488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Van de Kerk, Geurt & Manuel, Arthur R., 2008. "A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI -- the Sustainable Society Index," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 228-242, June.
    3. Christian Hunold & John S. Dryzek, 2002. "Green Political Theory and the State: Context is Everything," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 2(3), pages 17-39, August.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11438 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Anna Bluszcz, 2016. "Erratum to: Classification of the European Union member states according to the relative level of sustainable development," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2607-2607, November.
    6. Erling Holden & Kristin Linnerud, 2007. "The sustainable development area: satisfying basic needs and safeguarding ecological sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(3), pages 174-187.
    7. Sanya Carley & Adrienne Brown & Sara Lawrence, 2012. "Economic Development and Energy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 26(2), pages 111-123, May.
    8. Sanya Carley & Sara Lawrence, 2014. "Energy-Based Economic Development," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4471-6341-1, December.
    9. Ergül Halisçelik & Mehmet Ali Soytas, 2019. "Sustainable development from millennium 2015 to Sustainable Development Goals 2030," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 545-572, July.
    10. Maria Urbaniec, 2015. "Sustainable Development Indicators in Poland: Measurement and System Evaluation," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(1), pages 119-134.
    11. Wang, Juan & Zhang, Sulan & Zhang, Qingjun, 2021. "The relationship of renewable energy consumption to financial development and economic growth in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 897-904.
    12. ROUKANAS Spyros, 2020. "Measuring Economic Development And The Impact Of Economic Globalisation," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 15(3), pages 185-207, December.
    13. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Erkut, Burak & Mundi, Hardeep Singh, 2021. "Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: Evidence from panel estimations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    14. Ouedraogo, Nadia S., 2013. "Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the economic community of West African States (ECOWAS)," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 637-647.
    15. Emil E. Malizia, 1990. "Economic Growth and Economic Development: Concepts and Measures," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 20(1), pages 30-36, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beata Kalinowska & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Bogdan Klepacki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Tomasz Rokicki, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Agriculture in Member States of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Joanna Wyleżałek, 2021. "Dilemmas around the Energy Transition in the Perspective of Peter Blau’s Social Exchange Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Marcin Bogdański & Marcin Janusz, 2022. "Small Towns’ Functions as a Determinant of the Standard of Living in Rural Areas—An Example from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk, 2021. "The Role of Pro-Innovative HR Practices and Psychological Contract in Shaping Employee Commitment and Satisfaction: A Case from the Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    2. Carley, Sanya & Desai, Sameeksha & Bazilian, Morgan, 2012. "Energy-Based Economic Development: Mapping the Developing Country Context," Energy: Resources and Markets 123278, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden & Morten Simonsen, 2021. "Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 738-753, July.
    4. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Adam Pawlewicz, 2020. "Interregional Diversity of Social Capital in the Context of Sustainable Development—A Case Study of Polish Voivodeships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Ellalee, Haider & Al-Qaysi, Israa I., 2023. "Digital Government a Pathway to Sustainable Development," MPRA Paper 118178, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2023.
    6. Ruilian Zhang & John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp & Guoqing Shi, 2022. "An applied framework for assessing the relative deprivation of dam‐affected communities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 176-190, February.
    7. Trinh, Hai Hong & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Vo, Diem Thi Hong, 2022. "Examining the heterogeneity of financial development in the energy-environment nexus in the era of climate change: Novel evidence around the world," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Jyrki Luukkanen & Jarmo Vehmas & Jari Kaivo-oja, 2021. "Quantification of Doughnut Economy with the Sustainability Window Method: Analysis of Development in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Holden, Erling & Linnerud, Kristin & Banister, David, 2013. "Sustainable passenger transport: Back to Brundtland," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 67-77.
    10. Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & Mª Galindo-Villardón & Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa, 2015. "Analysis of the Sustainable Society Index Worldwide: A Study from the Biplot Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 29-65, January.
    11. Swati Sinha Babu & Soumyendra Datta, 2016. "A Study of Co-variation and Convergence of Alternative Measures of Sustainability on the Basis of Panel Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 377-396, January.
    12. Magdalena Ziolo & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Iwona Bąk & Katarzyna Cheba & Diana Mihaela Tîrca & Isabel Novo-Corti, 2019. "Finance, Sustainability and Negative Externalities. An Overview of the European Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-35, August.
    13. Jones, Michael John, 2010. "Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 123-138.
    14. Ahmad M. Khalid & Seema Sharma & Amlendu K. Dubey, 2018. "Developing an indicator set for measuring sustainable development in India," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 185-200, August.
    15. Milica Maricic & Marija Jankovic & Veljko Jeremic, 2014. "Towards a Framework for Evaluating Sustainable Society Index," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 62(3), pages 49-62, September.
    16. Mundaca, Luis & Luth Richter, Jessika, 2015. "Assessing ‘green energy economy’ stimulus packages: Evidence from the U.S. programs targeting renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1174-1186.
    17. Bojkovic, Natasa & Anic, Ivan & Pejcic-Tarle, Snezana, 2010. "One solution for cross-country transport-sustainability evaluation using a modified ELECTRE method," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1176-1186, March.
    18. Constantin Anghelache & Mădălina Gabriela Anghel & Ștefan Virgil Iacob & Ion Pârțachi & Irina Gabriela Rădulescu & Alina Gabriela Brezoi, 2023. "Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    19. Janet Hammer & Gary Pivo, 2017. "The Triple Bottom Line and Sustainable Economic Development Theory and Practice," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(1), pages 25-36, February.
    20. Miguel Rodríguez-Rosa & Isabel Gallego-Álvarez & Mª Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mª Purificación Galindo-Villardón, 2017. "Are Social, Economic and Environmental Well-Being Equally Important in all Countries Around the World? A Study by Income Levels," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 543-565, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:22:p:7488-:d:675502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.