Author
Listed:
- Peter Leonard
(Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 HX31 Galway, Ireland
Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)
- Eoghan Clifford
(Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 HX31 Galway, Ireland
Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)
- William Finnegan
(Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 HX31 Galway, Ireland
Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
SFI MaREI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)
- Alma Siggins
(Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 HX31 Galway, Ireland
Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
School of Natural Science, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)
- Xinmin Zhan
(Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland, H91 HX31 Galway, Ireland
Ryan Institute for Environmental, Marine and Energy Research, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland
SFI MaREI Research Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, National University of Ireland, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)
Abstract
Increased pressure is being applied to industrial wastewater treatment facilities to adhere to more stringent regulations for the discharge of treated wastewater and to improve energy efficiency of the process. Nitrogen and phosphorous removal can be challenging to achieve efficiently, and in the case of phosphorous removal, can often necessitate the use of chemicals. There is a major drive globally to improve wastewater treatment infrastructure, whilst simultaneously reducing the carbon footprint of the process. The intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor offers a modification of the well-known sequencing batch reactor process that can enable lower energy requirements than conventional sequencing batch reactor processes and can facilitate enhanced nutrient removal capacities. However, to date much of the previous literature has focused on relatively short laboratory-scale trials (often with synthetic wastewater) which may not be representative of larger scale system performance. This study explored the intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor technology via a case-study deployment at a dairy production facility, in terms of treatment efficiency and energy efficiency with a focus on optimisation between phases. High treatment capacity and operational flexibility was achieved with NH 4 -N removals averaging >89%, PO 4 -P removal averaging >90% and total suspended solids removal averaging >97%. This research demonstrates the characteristics of intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor technology at scale to effectively achieve biological nutrient removal. In addition, this study demonstrated that when effectively managed, energy savings and reductions in carbon emissions in the region of 36–68% are achievable through optimisation of reactor operation.
Suggested Citation
Peter Leonard & Eoghan Clifford & William Finnegan & Alma Siggins & Xinmin Zhan, 2021.
"Deployment and Optimisation of a Pilot-Scale IASBR System for Treatment of Dairy Processing Wastewater,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7365-:d:672765
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Rui Boavida-Dias & João R. Silva & Andreia D. Santos & Rui C. Martins & Luis M. Castro & Rosa M. Quinta-Ferreira, 2022.
"A Comparison of Biosolids Production and System Efficiency between Activated Sludge, Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor, and Sequencing Batch Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor in the Dairy Wastewater Treatment,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, February.
- Muhammad Irfan & Sharjeel Waqas & Javed Akbar Khan & Saifur Rahman & Izabela Kruszelnicka & Dobrochna Ginter-Kramarczyk & Stanislaw Legutko & Marek Ochowiak & Sylwia Włodarczak & Krystian Czernek, 2022.
"Effect of Operating Parameters and Energy Expenditure on the Biological Performance of Rotating Biological Contactor for Wastewater Treatment,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7365-:d:672765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.