IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7116-d669685.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Optimization of Multi-Layer Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Vehicle Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Koua Malick Cisse

    (SATIE, CNRS, Groupe PSA, ENS Paris-Saclay, 61 Avenue du Président Wilson, 94230 Cachan, France)

  • Sami Hlioui

    (SATIE, CNRS, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM), 292 Rue Saint-Martin, 75003 Paris, France)

  • Mhamed Belhadi

    (Stellantis, 212 Bd Pelletier, 78955 Carrières-sous-Poissy, France)

  • Guillaume Mermaz Rollet

    (Stellantis, 212 Bd Pelletier, 78955 Carrières-sous-Poissy, France)

  • Mohamed Gabsi

    (SATIE, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, 61 Avenue du Président Wilson, 94230 Cachan, France)

  • Yuan Cheng

    (Groupe PSA, Route de Gisy, 78140 Vélizy, France)

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between two design methodologies applied to permanent magnet synchronous machines for hybrid and electric vehicles (HEVs and EVs). Both methodologies are based on 2D finite element models and coupled to a genetic algorithm to optimize complex non-linear geometries such as multi-layer permanent magnet machines. To reduce the computation duration to evaluate Induced Voltage and Iron Losses for a given electrical machine configuration, a new methodology based on geometrical symmetries and magnetic symmetries are used and is detailed. Two electromagnetic models have been developed and used in the design stage. The first model was the stepped rotor position finite element analysis called abc model which considered the spatial harmonics without any approximation of the waveform of flux linkage inside the stator, and the second model was based on a fixed rotor position called dq model, with the approximation that the waveform of flux linkage inside the stator was sinuous. These two methodologies are applied to the design of a synchronous machine for HEVs and EVs applications. Design results and performances are analyzed, and the advantages and drawbacks of each methodology are presented. It was found that the dq model is at least 5 times faster than the abc model with high precision for both the torque and induce voltage evaluation in most cases. However, it is not the case for the iron losses computation. The iron loss model based on dq model is less accurate than the abc model with a relative deviation from the abc model greater than 70% at high control angle. The choice of the electromagnetic model during the optimization process will therefore influence the geometry and the performances of the obtained electrical machine after the optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Koua Malick Cisse & Sami Hlioui & Mhamed Belhadi & Guillaume Mermaz Rollet & Mohamed Gabsi & Yuan Cheng, 2021. "Design Optimization of Multi-Layer Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines for Electric Vehicle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7116-:d:669685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yacine Amara, 2023. "Design, Modeling, and Control of Rotating and Linear Electric Machines for Automotive Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-3, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7116-:d:669685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.