IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i20p6794-d658857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity Analysis of a Two-Phase CFD Simulation of a 1 kN Paraffin-Fueled Hybrid Rocket Motor

Author

Listed:
  • Benoit Dequick

    (Royal Military Academy, Avenue de la Renaissance 30, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Michel Lefebvre

    (Royal Military Academy, Avenue de la Renaissance 30, 1000 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Patrick Hendrick

    (École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Aero-Thermo-Mechanics Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

At Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), research was performed on a 1 kN lab-scale Hybrid Rocket Motor (the ULB-HRM). It has a single-port solid paraffin fuel grain and uses liquid N 2 O as an oxidizer. The first Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of the motor was developed in 2020 and improved in 2021, using ANSYS Fluent software. It is a 2D axisymmetric, two-phase steady-state Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model, which uses the average fuel and oxidizer mass flow rates as inputs. It includes oxidizer spray droplets and entrained fuel droplets, therefore adding many additional parameters compared to a single-phase model. It must be investigated how they affect the predicted operating conditions. In this article, a sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the model’s robustness. It is demonstrated that the CFD model performs well within the boundaries of its purpose, with average deviations between predicted and experimental values of about 1 % for the chamber pressure and 5 % for the thrust. From the sensitivity analysis, multiple observations and conclusions are made. An important observation is that oxidizer related parameters have the highest potential impact, introducing deviations of the predicted operating chamber pressure of up to 18%, while this is only about 6 % for fuel-related parameters. In general, the baseline CFD model of the ULB-HRM seems quite insensitive and it does not suffer from an excessive or abnormal sensitivity to any of the major parameters. Furthermore, the predicted operating conditions seem to respond in a logical and coherent way to changing input parameters. The model therefore seems sufficiently reliable to be used for future qualitative and quantitative predictions of the performance of the ULB-HRM.

Suggested Citation

  • Benoit Dequick & Michel Lefebvre & Patrick Hendrick, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis of a Two-Phase CFD Simulation of a 1 kN Paraffin-Fueled Hybrid Rocket Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-35, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6794-:d:658857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/20/6794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:20:p:6794-:d:658857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.