IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5542-d629349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of CO 2 Flooding on the Wettability Evolution of Sand-Stone

Author

Listed:
  • Cut Aja Fauziah

    (Western Australia School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Discipline of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Kensington 6151, Australia)

  • Ahmed Al-Yaseri

    (Western Australia School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Discipline of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Kensington 6151, Australia
    Petroleum Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait 13015, Kuwait)

  • Emad Al-Khdheeawi

    (Petroleum Technology Department, University of Technology, Baghdad 10071, Iraq)

  • Nilesh Kumar Jha

    (School of Petroleum Technology, Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Raisan, Gandhinagar 382007, India)

  • Hussein Rasool Abid

    (Western Australia School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Discipline of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Kensington 6151, Australia
    School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6027, Australia
    Environmental Department, Applied Medical Science, University of Karbala, Karbala 56001, Iraq)

  • Stefan Iglauer

    (School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6027, Australia)

  • Christopher Lagat

    (Western Australia School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Discipline of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Kensington 6151, Australia)

  • Ahmed Barifcani

    (Western Australia School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Discipline of Petroleum Engineering, Curtin University, Kensington 6151, Australia)

Abstract

Wettability is one of the main parameters controlling CO 2 injectivity and the movement of CO 2 plume during geological CO 2 sequestration. Despite significant research efforts, there is still a high uncertainty associated with the wettability of CO 2 /brine/rock systems and how they evolve with CO 2 exposure. This study, therefore, aims to measure the contact angle of sandstone samples with varying clay content before and after laboratory core flooding at different reservoir pressures, of 10 MPa and 15 MPa, and a temperature of 323 K. The samples’ microstructural changes are also assessed to investigate any potential alteration in the samples’ structure due to carbonated water exposure. The results show that the advancing and receding contact angles increased with the increasing pressure for both the Berea and Bandera Gray samples. Moreover, the results indicate that Bandera Gray sandstone has a higher contact angle. The sandstones also turn slightly more hydrophobic after core flooding, indicating that the sandstones become more CO 2 -wet after CO 2 injection. These results suggest that CO 2 flooding leads to an increase in the CO 2 -wettability of sandstone, and thus an increase in vertical CO 2 plume migration and solubility trapping, and a reduction in the residual trapping capacity, especially when extrapolated to more prolonged field-scale injection and exposure times.

Suggested Citation

  • Cut Aja Fauziah & Ahmed Al-Yaseri & Emad Al-Khdheeawi & Nilesh Kumar Jha & Hussein Rasool Abid & Stefan Iglauer & Christopher Lagat & Ahmed Barifcani, 2021. "Effect of CO 2 Flooding on the Wettability Evolution of Sand-Stone," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5542-:d:629349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emad A. Al‐Khdheeawi & Stephanie Vialle & Ahmed Barifcani & Mohammad Sarmadivaleh & Stefan Iglauer, 2017. "Influence of CO 2 ‐wettability on CO 2 migration and trapping capacity in deep saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 328-338, April.
    2. Klaus S. Lackner & Jeffrey D. Sachs, 2005. "A Robust Strategy for Sustainable Energy," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 36(2), pages 215-284.
    3. Chris J. Ballentine & Martin Schoell & Dennis Coleman & Bruce A. Cain, 2001. "300-Myr-old magmatic CO2 in natural gas reservoirs of the west Texas Permian basin," Nature, Nature, vol. 409(6818), pages 327-331, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Xin & Li, Shaohua & Tong, Baocai & Jiang, Lanlan & Lv, Pengfei & Zhang, Yi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yongchen, 2024. "Multiscale wettability characterization under CO2 geological storage conditions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    2. Aysylu Askarova & Aliya Mukhametdinova & Strahinja Markovic & Galiya Khayrullina & Pavel Afanasev & Evgeny Popov & Elena Mukhina, 2023. "An Overview of Geological CO 2 Sequestration in Oil and Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-34, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anabela Botelho & Lina Sofia Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia Costa Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: two stated preferences approaches," NIMA Working Papers 64, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    2. Sebastiano Cupertino, 2013. "Cost-benefit analysis of carbon dioxide capture and storage considering the impact of two different climate change mitigation regimes," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 73-89.
    3. Soren Lindner & Sonja Peterson & Wilhelm Windhorst, 2010. "An economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) power plants: a case study for the City of Kiel," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 1069-1088.
    4. Liu, Quanyou & Zhu, Dongya & Jin, Zhijun & Tian, Hailong & Zhou, Bing & Jiang, Peixue & Meng, Qingqiang & Wu, Xiaoqi & Xu, Huiyuan & Hu, Ting & Zhu, Huixing, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage for long-term and safe sealing with constrained natural CO2 analogs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    5. Gregory F. Nemet and Adam R. Brandt, 2012. "Willingness to Pay for a Climate Backstop: Liquid Fuel Producers and Direct CO2 Air Capture," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    6. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2009. "Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1082-1088, June.
    7. Stokes, Leah C., 2013. "The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 490-500.
    8. Valentina Bosetti & Emanuele Massetti & Massimo Tavoni, 2007. "The WITCH Model. Structure, Baseline, Solutions," Working Papers 2007.10, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Horner, Robert M. & Clark, Corrie E., 2013. "Characterizing variability and reducing uncertainty in estimates of solar land use energy intensity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 129-137.
    10. Wang, Xin & Li, Shaohua & Tong, Baocai & Jiang, Lanlan & Lv, Pengfei & Zhang, Yi & Liu, Yu & Song, Yongchen, 2024. "Multiscale wettability characterization under CO2 geological storage conditions: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    11. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun & Gonela, Vinay & Awudu, Iddrisu, 2013. "Electricity generation from renewables in the United States: Resource potential, current usage, technical status, challenges, strategies, policies, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 454-472.
    12. Botelho, Anabela & Lourenço-Gomes, Lina & Pinto, Lígia & Sousa, Sara & Valente, Marieta, 2017. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 191-198.
    13. Ulrich Wolfgang Weber & Niko Kampman & Anja Sundal, 2021. "Techno-Economic Aspects of Noble Gases as Monitoring Tracers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Nadine Heitmann & Christine Bertram & Daiju Narita, 2012. "Embedding CCS infrastructure into the European electricity system: a policy coordination problem," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(6), pages 669-686, August.
    15. Anabela Botelho & Lina Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia M. Costa Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2018. "Discrete-choice experiments valuing local environmental impacts of renewables: two approaches to a case study in Portugal," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 145-162, December.
    16. Emad A. Al-Khdheeawi & Doaa Saleh Mahdi & Yujie Yuan & Stefan Iglauer, 2023. "Influence of Clay Content on CO 2 -Rock Interaction and Mineral-Trapping Capacity of Sandstone Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    17. Joarder Munim & Md. Hakim & Md. Abdullah-Al-Mamun, 2010. "Analysis of energy consumption and indicators of energy use in Bangladesh," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 275-302, November.
    18. Scott Barrett, 2009. "The Coming Global Climate-Technology Revolution," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 53-75, Spring.
    19. Garth Heutel & Juan Moreno-Cruz & Katharine Ricke, 2016. "Climate Engineering Economics," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 99-118, October.
    20. Narita, Daiju, 2009. "Economic optimality of CCS use: a resource-economic model," Kiel Working Papers 1508, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5542-:d:629349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.