IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5337-d623599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Numerical Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration within a Five-Spot Well Pattern in the Morrow B Sandstone of the Farnsworth Hydrocarbon Field: Comparison of the TOUGHREACT, STOMP-EOR, and GEM Simulators

Author

Listed:
  • Eusebius J. Kutsienyo

    (Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Martin S. Appold

    (Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA)

  • Mark D. White

    (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA 99354, USA)

  • William Ampomah

    (Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USA)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the fate and impact of CO 2 injected into the Morrow B Sandstone in the Farnsworth Unit (FWU) through numerical non-isothermal reactive transport modeling, and (2) to compare the performance of three major reactive solute transport simulators, TOUGHREACT, STOMP-EOR, and GEM, under the same input conditions. The models were based on a quarter of a five-spot well pattern where CO 2 was injected on a water-alternating-gas schedule for the first 25 years of the 1000 year simulation. The reservoir pore fluid consisted of water with or without petroleum. The results of the models have numerous broad similarities, such as the pattern of reservoir cooling caused by the injected fluids, a large initial pH drop followed by gradual pH neutralization, the long-term persistence of an immiscible CO 2 gas phase, the continuous dissolution of calcite, very small decreases in porosity, and the increasing importance over time of carbonate mineral CO 2 sequestration. The models differed in their predicted fluid pressure evolutions; amounts of mineral precipitation and dissolution; and distribution of CO 2 among immiscible gas, petroleum, formation water, and carbonate minerals. The results of the study show the usefulness of numerical simulations in identifying broad patterns of behavior associated with CO 2 injection, but also point to significant uncertainties in the numerical values of many model output parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Eusebius J. Kutsienyo & Martin S. Appold & Mark D. White & William Ampomah, 2021. "Numerical Modeling of CO 2 Sequestration within a Five-Spot Well Pattern in the Morrow B Sandstone of the Farnsworth Hydrocarbon Field: Comparison of the TOUGHREACT, STOMP-EOR, and GEM Simulators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5337-:d:623599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William Ampomah & Brian McPherson & Robert Balch & Reid Grigg & Martha Cather, 2022. "Forecasting CO 2 Sequestration with Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-7, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5337-:d:623599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.