Author
Listed:
- Qi Kang
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China
Current address: National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety/MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering/Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China.
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jiapeng Gu
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Xueyu Qi
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Ting Wu
(Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Shengjie Wang
(China Oil and Gas Pipeline Network Corporation, Oil&Gas Control Center, Beijing 100028, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Sihang Chen
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Wei Wang
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China)
- Jing Gong
(National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Fuxue Road No. 18, Changping District, Beijing 102249, China)
Abstract
In the petrochemical industry, multiphase flow, including oil–water two-phase stratified laminar flow, is more common and can be easily obtained through mathematical analysis. However, there is limited mathematical analytical model for the simulation of oil–water flow under turbulent flow. This paper introduces a two-dimensional (2D) numerical simulation method to investigate the pressure gradient, flow field, and oil–water interface height of a pipeline cross-section of horizontal tube in an oil–water stratified smooth flow. Three Reynolds average N–S equation models ( k − ε , k − ω , SST k − ω ) are involved to simulate oil–water stratified smooth flow according to the finite volume method. The pressure gradient and oil–water interface height can be computed according to the given volume flow rate using the iteration method. The predicted result of oil–water interface height and velocity profile by the model fit well with several published experimental data, except that there is a large error in pressure gradient. The SST k − ω turbulence model appears higher accuracy for simulating oil–water two-phase stratified flow in a horizontal pipe.
Suggested Citation
Qi Kang & Jiapeng Gu & Xueyu Qi & Ting Wu & Shengjie Wang & Sihang Chen & Wei Wang & Jing Gong, 2021.
"Hydrodynamic Modeling of Oil–Water Stratified Smooth Two-Phase Turbulent Flow in Horizontal Circular Pipes,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5201-:d:619792
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Duan, Jimiao & Gong, Jing & Yao, Haiyuan & Deng, Tao & Zhou, Jun, 2014.
"Numerical modeling for stratified gas–liquid flow and heat transfer in pipeline,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 83-94.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Kylili, Angeliki & Fokaides, Paris A. & Christou, Petros & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2014.
"Infrared thermography (IRT) applications for building diagnostics: A review,"
Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 531-549.
- Wang, Mi & Liu, Jiegui & Bai, Yuxin & Zheng, Dandan & Fang, Lide, 2024.
"Flow rate measurement of gas-liquid annular flow through a combined multimodal ultrasonic and differential pressure sensor,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:16:p:5201-:d:619792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.