Author
Listed:
- Seongmin Kang
(Climate Chang Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)
- Seonghum Cho
(Climate Chang Research Center, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)
- Joonyoung Roh
(Cooperate Course for Climate Change, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)
- Eui-chan Jeon
(Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea)
Abstract
This study has statistically analyzed the effect of boiler type and model year on CH 4 emission factors, focusing on liquefied natural gas (LNG)—the most commonly used fuel in South Korean manufacturing combustion facilities. Samples were collected from the boilers of 39 manufacturing combustion facilities that use LNG fuel. The CH 4 emission factors were developed based on 4 overhead fire-tube boilers, 14 once-through boilers, 14 vertical boilers with vertical water tubes, and 7 other boilers. This resulted in an average value of 0.11 CH 4 kg/TJ, which is considerably lower than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 1996 guidelines(G/L) emission factor of 5 CH 4 kg/TJ currently used in South Korea. In the Kruskal–Wallis test results, the significance probability was greater than 0.05 for the boiler types and ages, and there was no major difference in the average distributions, according to the boiler type or age. Therefore, according to the results of this study, the differences in the CH 4 emission factors according to the boiler types and ages are not statistically large, and it was determined that there is no major difference even when the emission factors are applied to different fuel types. However, there was a major difference when the developed factors were compared to the CH 4 emission factor proposed by the IPCC. Thus, there is a need to develop manufacturing combustion CH 4 emission factors that reflect national characteristics.
Suggested Citation
Seongmin Kang & Seonghum Cho & Joonyoung Roh & Eui-chan Jeon, 2020.
"Analysis of Main Factors for CH 4 Emission Factor Development in Manufacturing Industries and Construction Sector,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1220-:d:329443
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1220-:d:329443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.