IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i2p467-d310124.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wavy Airfoil for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Regime in Gliding Flight

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Tang

    (College of Automotive Engineering, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China
    State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1 Yamada-oka, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan)

  • Yulong Lei

    (College of Automotive Engineering, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China
    State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Xingzhong Li

    (College of Automotive Engineering, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China
    State Key Laboratory of Automotive Simulation and Control, Jilin University, Renmin Street No. 5988, Changchun 130012, China)

  • Ke Gao

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Changchun Road No. 169, Jilin 132012, China)

  • Yanli Li

    (FAW Jiefang Automobile Co., Ltd., Jincheng Street No. 3082, Changchun 130011, China)

Abstract

The effect of the number of waves and the width of the ridge and valley in chord direction for a wavy airfoil was investigated at the angle of attack of 0 ∘ and Reynolds number of 10 3 through using the two-dimensional direct numerical simulation for four kinds of wavy airfoil shapes. A new method for parameterizing a wavy airfoil was proposed. In comparison with the original corrugated airfoil profile, the wavy airfoils that have more distinct waves show a lower aerodynamic efficiency and the wavy airfoils that have less distinct waves show higher aerodynamic performance. For the breakdown of the lift and drag concerning the pressure stress and friction stress contributions, the pressure stress component is significantly dominant for all wavy airfoil shapes concerning the lift. Concerning the drag, the pressure stress component is about 75 % for the wavy airfoils that have more distinct waves, while the frictional stress component is about 70 % for the wavy airfoils that have less distinct waves. From the distribution of pressure isoline and streamlines around wavy airfoils, it is confirmed that the pressure contributions of the drag are dominant due to high pressure on the upstream side and low pressure on the downside; the frictional contribution of the drag is dominant due to large surface areas of the airfoil facing the external flow. The effect of the angle of attack on the aerodynamic efficiency for various wavy airfoil geometries was studied as well. Aerodynamic shape optimization based on the continuous adjoint approach was applied to obtain as much as possible the highest global aerodynamic efficiency wavy airfoil shape. The optimal airfoil shape corresponds to an increase of 60 % and 62 % over the aerodynamic efficiency and the lift from the initial geometry, respectively, when optimal airfoil has an approximate drag coefficient compared to the initial geometry. Concerning an fixed angle of attack, the optimal airfoil is statically unstable in the range of the angle of attack from − 1 ∘ to 6 ∘ , statically quasi-stable from − 6 ∘ to − 2 ∘ , where the vortex is shedding at the optimal airfoil leading edge. Concerning an angle of attack passively varied due to the fluid force, the optimal airfoil keeps the initial angle of attack value with an initial disturbance, then quickly increases the angle of attack and diverges in the positive direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Tang & Yulong Lei & Xingzhong Li & Ke Gao & Yanli Li, 2020. "Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wavy Airfoil for Ultra-Low Reynolds Number Regime in Gliding Flight," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:467-:d:310124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/2/467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Tang & Yulong Lei & Xingzhong Li, 2019. "An Acoustic Source Model for Applications in Low Mach Number Turbulent Flows, Such as a Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Hui Tang & Yulong Lei & Xingzhong Li & Yao Fu, 2019. "Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics and Attitude Stability of a Bio-Inspired Corrugated Airfoil for MAV or UAV Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ion Malael & Ioana Octavia Bucur, 2021. "Numerical Evaluation of the Flow around a New Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Yufei Zhang & Chongyang Yan & Haixin Chen, 2020. "An Inverse Design Method for Airfoils Based on Pressure Gradient Distribution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Ferrara & Alessandro Bianchini, 2021. "Special Issue “Numerical Simulation of Wind Turbines”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-2, March.
    2. Hui Tang & Yulong Lei & Xingzhong Li, 2019. "An Acoustic Source Model for Applications in Low Mach Number Turbulent Flows, Such as a Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:2:p:467-:d:310124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.