Author
Listed:
- Woo-Young Lee
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Jang-Un Jun
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Ho-Seok Oh
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Jun-Kyu Park
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Yeon-Ho Oh
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Ki-Dong Song
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
- Hyun-Jae Jang
(Power Apparatus Research Division, Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute, 12, Bulmosan-ro 10beon-gil, Changwon-si 51543, Korea)
Abstract
In the study, an interrupting performance test on the 145 kV gas circuit breaker is performed according to three different gases: SF 6 , g 3 (5% Novec T M 4710 with 95% CO 2 ), and CO 2 (70%)/O 2 (30%) gases. Thanks to research advancements, it is confirmed that CO 2 and g 3 (5% Novec T M 4710) gases, respectively, have 40% and 75% dielectric strength, compared to that of SF 6 gas. The filling pressure and transient recovery voltage criteria of each gas were determined differently in order to compare the maximum interrupting performance of each gas. The pressure of SF 6 gas was determined to be 5.5 bar, which is typically used in circuit breakers. The pressure of the other two gases was determined to be 8.0 bar (the maximum available pressure of the test circuit breaker) to find the maximum interrupting performance. Moreover, the rate-of-rise of transient recovery voltage of SF 6 was determined as 10 kV/ μ s, which is the value at the state of maximum interrupting performance of the test circuit breaker with SF 6 . On the other hand, the rate-of-rise of transient recovery voltages of g 3 (5% Novec T M 4710 with 95% CO 2 ) and CO 2 (70%)/O 2 (30%) gases were, respectively, determined as 4∼5 kV/ μ s to find the interruption available point. The characteristics of arc conductance, arc current, and arc voltage near the current zero, and post-arc current are analyzed to compare the interrupting performance, according to different arc-quenching gases. The arc current is measured using a current transformer (Rogowski coil), and a signal processing method of the arc current and arc voltage is introduced to increase the reliability of the interrupting performance results. As a result of the test, it is confirmed that the critical arc conductance for all test conditions converged within a certain range and the value is around 0.7 mS. In addition, the critical current slope just before the current zero-crossing during the interrupting process is shown to be 1.8 A/ μ s between interruption success and failure. Consequently, it is verified that the CO 2 (70%)/O 2 (30%) mixture and g 3 (5% Novec T M 4710 with 95% CO 2 ) have a similar arc extinguishing performance and SF 6 has a relatively higher extinguishing performance than that of CO 2 (70%)/O 2 (30%) mixture and g 3 (5% Novec T M 4710 with 95% CO 2 ) under the aforementioned filling pressure and TRV conditions.
Suggested Citation
Woo-Young Lee & Jang-Un Jun & Ho-Seok Oh & Jun-Kyu Park & Yeon-Ho Oh & Ki-Dong Song & Hyun-Jae Jang, 2020.
"Comparison of the Interrupting Capability of Gas Circuit Breaker According to SF 6 , g 3 , and CO 2 /O 2 Mixture,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6388-:d:455536
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6388-:d:455536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.