Gas Pressure Cycling (GPC) and Solvent-Assisted Gas Pressure Cycling (SA-GPC) Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes in a Thin Heavy Oil Reservoir

In this paper, gas pressure cycling (GPC) and solvent-assisted gas pressure cycling (SA-GPC) were developed as two new and effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Eight coreflood tests were conducted by using a 2-D rectangular sandpacked physical model with a one or two-well configuration. More specifically, two cyclic solvent injection (CSI), three GPC, and three SA-GPC tests were conducted after the primary production, whose pressure was declined in steps from P i = 3.0 MPa to P f = 0.2 MPa. It was found that the CSI tests had poor performances because of the known CSI technical shortcomings and an additional technical issue of solvent trapping found in this study. Quick heavy oil viscosity regainment resulted in the solvent-trapping zone. In contrast, C 3 H 8 -GPC test at a pressure depletion step size of ∆ P EOR = 0.5 MPa and C 3 H 8 -SA-CO 2 -GPC test at ∆ P EOR = 1.0 MPa had the highest total heavy oil recovery factors (RFs) of 41.9% and 36.6% of the original oil-in-place (OOIP) among the two respective series of GPC and SA-GPC tests. The better performances of these two tests than C 3 H 8 - or CO 2 -CSI test were attributed to the effective displacement of the foamy oil toward the producer in the two-well configuration. Thus the back-and-forth movements of the foamy oil in CSI test in the one-well configuration were eliminated in these GPC and SA-GPC tests. Furthermore, C 3 H 8 -GPC test outperformed C 3 H 8 -SA-CO 2 -GPC test in terms of the heavy oil RF and cumulative gas-oil ratio (cGOR) because of the formation of stronger foamy-oil flow and the absence of CO 2 , which reduced the solubility of C 3 H 8 in the heavy oil in the latter test. In summary, different solvent-based EOR processes were ranked based on the heavy oil RFs as follows: C 3 H 8 -GPC > C 3 H 8 -SA-CO 2 -GPC > CO 2 -GPC > C 3 H 8 -CSI > CO 2 -CSI.