IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i17p4559-d407992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of Coal Structure Combinations and Their Influence on Hydraulic Fracturing: A Case Study from the Qinshui Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Du Liu

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanbin Wang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaoming Ni

    (School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454003, China)

  • Chuanqi Tao

    (School of Mining Engineering, Liaoning Shihua University, Fushun 113001, China)

  • Jingjing Fan

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiang Wu

    (China United Coalbed Methane Co., Ltd., Beijing 100011, China)

  • Shihu Zhao

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Coal structure directly correlates to permeability and hydraulic fracturing effects. Underground coal mining indicates that a single coal section generally contains multiple coal structures in superposition, making how to recognise the coal structure combination and predict its influence on coal permeability a challenging problem. Based on well-drilling sampled cores, the geological strength index (GSI), and well-logging data, the DEN, GR, CALX, and CALY were selected to establish a model to predict GSI by multiple regression to identify coal structure from 100 coalbed methane wells. Based on fitting GSI and corresponding permeability test values, injection fall-off (IFO) testing, and hydraulic fracturing results, permeability prediction models for pre- and post-fracturing behaviour were established, respectively. The fracturing effect was evaluated by the difference in permeability. The results show that a reservoir can be classified into one of nine types by different coal structure thickness proportion (and combinations thereof) and the fracturing curves can be classified into four categories (and eight sub-categories) by the pressure curve. Up-down type I and type II reservoirs (proportion of hard coal >60%) and intervening interval type I reservoir (proportion of hard coal >70%) are prone to form stable and descending fracturing curves and the fracturing effects are optimal. Intervening interval type II (hard coal:soft coal:hard coal or soft coal:hard coal:soft coal ≈1:1:1) and up-down type III (hard coal:soft coal =1:1) form descending type II, rising type I and fluctuating type I fracturing curves and fracturing effect ranks second; up-down type IV and V (proportion of hard coal <40%), interval type III (proportion of hard coal <30%), and multi-layer superposition-type reservoirs readily form fluctuating and rising fracturing curves and fracturing effects therein are poor. The research results provide guidance for the targeted stimulation measured under different coal structure combinations.

Suggested Citation

  • Du Liu & Yanbin Wang & Xiaoming Ni & Chuanqi Tao & Jingjing Fan & Xiang Wu & Shihu Zhao, 2020. "Classification of Coal Structure Combinations and Their Influence on Hydraulic Fracturing: A Case Study from the Qinshui Basin, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4559-:d:407992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4559/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/17/4559/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:17:p:4559-:d:407992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.