Author
Listed:
- Jay Prakash Goit
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kindai University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-2116, Japan
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Koriyama 963-0298, Japan)
- Susumu Shimada
(National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Koriyama 963-0298, Japan)
- Tetsuya Kogaki
(National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Koriyama 963-0298, Japan)
Abstract
This paper discusses whether profiling LiDARs can replace meteorological tower-based wind speed measurement for wind energy applications without severely compromising accuracy. To this end, the accuracy of LiDAR is evaluated in a moderately complex terrain by comparing long-term wind data measured by a profiling LiDAR against those obtained from tower-mounted cup and sonic anemometers. The LiDAR-measured wind speeds show good agreement with those measured using the sonic anemometer, with the slope of regression line being 1.0 and R 2 > 0.99 . Furthermore, the turbulence intensity obtained from the LiDAR has better agreement with that from the sonic anemometer compared to the cup anemometer which showed the lowest turbulence intensities among the three devices. A comparison of the turbulence intensity obtained from the 90th percentile of the standard deviation distribution shows that the LiDAR-measured turbulence intensities are mostly larger (by 2% or less) than those measured by the sonic anemometer. The gust factors obtained from both devices roughly converged to 1.9, showing that LiDAR is able to measure peak wind speed with acceptable accuracy. The accuracy of the wind speed and power distributions measured using the profiling LiDAR are then evaluated by comparing them against the corresponding distributions obtained from the sonic anemometer. Furthermore, the annual capacity factor—for the NREL 5-MW wind turbine—from the LiDAR-measured wind speed is 2% higher than that obtained from the sonic anemometer-measured wind speed. Numerical simulations are performed using OpenFAST in order to compute fatigue loads for the wind speed and turbulence distributions for the LiDAR and the sonic anemometer measurements. It is found that the 20 years lifetime Damage Equivalent Loads (DELs) computed for the LiDAR wind speed were higher than those for the sonic anemometer wind speeds, by 2%–6% for the blade root bending moments and by 11%–13% for the tower base bending moments. This study shows that even with some shortcomings, profiling LiDARs can measure wind speeds and turbulence intensities with acceptable accuracy. Therefore, they can be used to analyze wind resource and wind power potential of prospective sites, and to evaluate whether those sites are suitable for wind energy development.
Suggested Citation
Jay Prakash Goit & Susumu Shimada & Tetsuya Kogaki, 2019.
"Can LiDARs Replace Meteorological Masts in Wind Energy?,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3680-:d:270959
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Tetsuya Kogaki & Kenichi Sakurai & Susumu Shimada & Hirokazu Kawabata & Yusuke Otake & Katsutoshi Kondo & Emi Fujita, 2020.
"Field Measurements of Wind Characteristics Using LiDAR on a Wind Farm with Downwind Turbines Installed in a Complex Terrain Region,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, October.
- He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Lee, C.W., 2022.
"Characterizing coastal wind energy resources based on sodar and microwave radiometer observations,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:19:p:3680-:d:270959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.